Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Wolfowitz To Replace Wolfensohn As World Bank Chief | WILLisms.com | Alaska: Open For Business. Finally. » For Terri Schiavo: The Incapacitated Person’s Legal Protection ActFlorida's new Republican Senator, Mel Martinez, has introduced a bill in the Senate, The Incapacitated Person’s Legal Protection Act of 2005, to save Terri Schiavo from dehydration/starvation. Martinez, in National Review, explains his legislation: This bill would ensure that incapacitated individuals — like Terri Schiavo — would have their due-process rights of habeas corpus when a court orders their death by removal of nutrition, hydration and medical treatment. My colleague from Florida, Congressman Dave Weldon has introduced identical legislation in the House of Representatives. Although Michael Schiavo seems intent on Terri dying, she is in fact not out of medical options (via blogsforterri.com): So how can Judge Greer ignore the opinions of so many qualified neurologists, some of whom are leaders in the field? The answer is that Michael Schiavo, his attorney George Felos, and Judge Greer already have the diagnosis they want. Indeed, a former nurse of Terri, Carla Sauer Iyer, recently explained that Terri is not in a vegetative state: The nurses, including Iyer, interacted with Terri and daily witnessed her respond, laugh, and make requests. “We had her at the front of the nurse’s station… everyone loved Terri,” Iyer said. Posted by Will Franklin · 16 March 2005 02:27 PM CommentsThe next thing you know the elderely and mentally retarded, and any other person whose mental capacity is diminished will be at risk. It is a bit like nazi germany and how Hitler handled matters. michael Schiavo needs to excuse himself as guardian. We give our death row inmates a more humane death, than starvation and dehydration. Besides Terri is not on any other life support other than her feeding tube. Cruel and unusual is what I would call it. I am sorry to see that this story hit so close to home for WILLisms.com. Posted by: concerned citizen at March 16, 2005 08:21 PM WHY IS IT THAT THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS SO PRO DEATH? THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS BECOMING KNOWN AS THE ANTI-LIFE PARTY. IS IT JUST ME? OR IS THERE SOMETHING WRONG WITH THAT PICTURE? IT SEEMS ALMOST RATHER MORBID, IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN... Posted by: ZSA zsa at March 17, 2005 02:50 PM Michael Schiavo has spent Terri's money on himself! He has abused his guardianship. Neglected terri's care! He continues spending the money he recieved to care for her on legal fees trying to starve her to death! This money should be paid back to Terri, for her well being. He hired a big time euthanasia attorney to get things under way for his wishes to pull her feeding tube out! All the while he has been using Terri's money awarded for her care! Michael you really need a reality check! Posted by: linda at March 18, 2005 06:24 AM Democrats are proud to be pro-death! It's what they do. Then they like to choose to word it Pro choice! To kill, or not to kill? That is the question! Posted by: rick at March 18, 2005 06:37 AM |