Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Blogging's Awesomeness: The World Becomes One Community. | WILLisms.com | A Message To Squeamish Republicans On Social Security: Reform Is Good Politics. » Social Security: Luddite Reactionary Liberals Receive $50 Certificates For Stuffing Money Into Mattresses.Some of those opposing Social Security reform seem to have a bizarre aversion to markets. It's as if, despite their own assets actively earning compound interest in stocks, bonds, mutal funds, and other investments, they believe those options are too "risky" for everyone else. Not only this, but no legitimate reform proposal includes allowing people to "gamble" their money, so their claims are even further disingenuous; the personal accounts would be more like the Thrift Savings Plan available to Federal employees, where individuals can choose among a handful of relatively safe options. In other words, the personal accounts would be safe. They would be broadly diversified and not at all susceptible to "another Enron." And they would certainly earn a better rate of return than the current system. Democrat seem to believe that stuffing money away for retirement is better policy than allowing the greatest free enterprise system in the world to grow the money. Well, Americans For Prosperity has decided to poke fun at the mattress-stuffing mentality of Democrats by sending key Democrats in Washington, as well as the head of the AARP, $50 gift certificates for Mattress Warehouse: “The current Social Security system only provides retirees with a 1-2 percent return on the payroll taxes they have taken from them throughout their lives,” said Americans for Prosperity President Nancy Pfotenhauer . “That's like saving for retirement by stuffing money in a mattress instead of wisely investing in safe, diversified index funds over 30 or 40 years. If these officials are so enamored of ‘mattress-stuffing' retirement planning, I hope they'll use these gift certificates toward the purchase of mattresses in which they can store their own retirement savings instead of growing their money in sound, safe investments like mutual funds or 401(k)'s.” Posted by Will Franklin · 15 March 2005 06:28 PM CommentsThe social security system is a great example of what a socialistic society represents! It represents very little security for those of us who count on this to take care of us. SOCIALISM IS LAME. SOCIAL SECURITY IS THE LAMEST. Being forced to invest in social security doesn't pay. FDR was an experimenter and would have advocated change to a bad program, why can't the current dems (demwits)? Posted by: Former Dem at March 17, 2005 07:30 AM |