Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed


Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links

Blogroll Me!







Search



Archives

July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008

Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Reform Thursday: Week Ten. | WILLisms.com | Giving George W. Bush Some Credit. »

Galveston, Texas: Social Security Reform's Living Laboratory.

Investor's Business Daily (via the Club For Growth blog) explains the case of Galveston, Texas, and its successful experimentation with Social Security reform:

For 24 years, three Texas counties have been a living lab for President Bush's proposal, and so far the experiment is working.

In the early 1980s, while the federal government was working on ways to "save" the Ponzi scheme known as Social Security from an earlier insolvency crisis, officials in Galveston County looked in the private sector for a retirement option that would improve on FDR's New Deal.

They were taking advantage of the fact that municipalities were not included in the original 1935 legislation creating Social Security.


So, how does it work?

IBD:

...contributions are essentially loaned to a top-rated financial institution for a guaranteed interest rate. Employees bear virtually no risk. They get their money, plus interest, whether the stock market goes up or down.

Upon their retirement, workers can take their money in a lump sum or purchase an annuity that will pay them a guaranteed income for life. It's their money, real money, in a real account with their name on it, and it's their choice. And when they die, all they have in their account becomes part of their estate.

In 24 years, no one has lost a single dime.


More, from Merrill Matthews Jr., Ph.D., of the Institute for Policy Innovation (.pdf):

Workers in Galveston contribute 9.7 percentage points of their payroll tax to retirement savings. The company that manages the Alternate Plan, First Financial Benefits of Houston, pools the money from all of the employees and loans it to a top-rated financial institution for a guaranteed interest rate. Those rates have varied from about 5 percent up to 15.5 percent, but average in the 7.5 percent to 8 percent range.

How the funds are broken down:

Galveston employees contribute 6.13 percent of their income while the county pays 7.785 percent (though it only has to pay 6.2 percent). The combined 13.915 percent is dispersed as follows:

• Retirement Annuity 9.737%

• Survivorship Benefit 2.85%

• Long-term Disability 1.18%

• Waiver of Premium .148%


But why did only three counties choose to opt out if privatization was so successful?

IBD explains:

In 1983, Congress removed the provision letting municipalities opt out.


If Congress had not removed that provision, one wonders just how many municipalities today would still be footling around, throwing their money away into Social Security. Probably not many.

Bill Cotterell, of the Tallahassee Democrat (via Andrew Roth of Social Security Choice), explains why Congress removed the provision:

The only time I've wanted to argue with somebody I was interviewing was when President Ford sent some high-level Social Security administrators to a public forum in Atlanta.

I asked the top guy why, instead of "fixing" the system every few years, the government didn't just make it voluntary.

"Well, if we did that," the lord high commissioner patiently replied, "nobody would join."

Not wanting to be impolite, I said something like, "Uh, doesn't that tell you something?" But I felt like shouting, "Great system you've got there, guys - gotta make it compulsory!"

IPI offers this comparison between Galveston's Alternate Plan and Social Security (click for larger version):
alternateplangalveston.gif
Original version: here.


However, let's not make the mistake of equating Galveston's plan for President Bush's plan. There are some very real technical differences between the two plans we won't go into because they are a bit arcane and wonkish; President Bush's principles for reform address the potential problems with Galveston's otherwise successful plan often cited by the media.

Galveston's example, though, is proof that Social Security reform, under free market principles, can work.

Posted by Will Franklin · 7 April 2005 01:22 PM

Comments

Will,

You might be amused at how a study commissioned by congressional Democrats opposing Social Security reform instead produced results supporting PRAs, even under their skewed assumptions.

But you might fall down laughing when you read how they're trying to spin the results....

Posted by: Ironman at April 8, 2005 12:11 PM

I like how you have the Galveston concept! I wish we could do something to persuade Democrats in Congress to stop opposing and start refoming! I wonder if they are somehow attached to Social Security for nostalgic reasons? Maybe because they are so fond of
FDR and just can't let go of the sentiment! I think it is time to let go of the past eras of Social Security and REFORM NOW!

Posted by: Buffy at April 11, 2005 11:26 AM