Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 39 -- Congressional Junkets. | WILLisms.com | Lebanon: The Return Of Aoun. » Bush Can Do No Right At The New York Times.The New York Times often seems happy to blame Bush for just about anything that goes wrong in the world. Their common complaint: Bush's narrow, stubborn focus on Iraq has allowed other problems around the world, in places such as North Korea or China or Iran or South America, to emerge. In short, the Times' editorial complaint is that the Bush administration is asleep at the wheel (it sounds eerily similar to a certain 2004 talking point from a certain Massachusetts Senator), allowing threats to flourish. By Dawn's Early Light blog has a great post that asks "Does the NYT Editorial Board read the NYT?" Very recommended reading. Bill Rice dismantles The New York Times' argument in surgical fashion, noting how the paper's gloomy narrative lacks internally consistent logic. Posted by Will Franklin · 7 May 2005 11:46 AM CommentsThe only thing the NY TIMES is good for is the crossword!...Other than that it is a bunch of liberal trash!...I really have no use for the Posted by: Zsa Zsa at May 7, 2005 12:17 PM |