Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 53 -- Kyoto. | WILLisms.com | REMINDER: Submit Carnival Of Revolutions Nominations. » Is Wi-Fi Public Infrastructure?An interesting read from the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School of Business: At issue are the following questions: Are broadband services better handled by the public or private sector? Can a wireless broadband network, commonly known as Wi-Fi (wireless fidelity), be used to help more low-income people gain online access, bridging what is commonly known as the digital divide? Will projects become caught up in politics? Should Internet access be viewed as city infrastructure, like telephone poles or city streets? Meanwhile, as Foreign Policy notes, the proportion of Americans using the internet has exploded in recent years: If Wi-Fi is considered infrastructure, like sewage systems or roads or power lines, what is the most effective way to get the U.S. to as close to 100% as possible? The United States has seen explosive productivity growth in recent years, mostly due to our general technological advantage over the rest of the world. Wi-Fi is definitely the (very near) future of productivity growth. Citizens being able to connect to the internet, anywhere, at any time, is going to be crucial for continued American economic dominance. Thus, it should be a priority to spread this technology. Should cities be in the business of Wi-Fi? Will the market leave certain smaller, or poorer, towns behind? Does the government overregulate this area already? The Wharton piece takes a nice look at these ideas. Ultimately, we have to ask ourselves: Is bridging the digital divide worth letting the same folks who are in charge of fixing potholes and issuing driver's licenses, also provide us with Wi-Fi? Posted by Will Franklin · 21 May 2005 11:03 AM Comments |