Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 44 -- The American Dream. | WILLisms.com | Thoughts. » Reform Thursday: Week Fifteen.
Thursdays are good days for reform, because they fall between Wednesdays and Fridays. That's why WILLisms.com will display a chart or graph, every Thursday, pertinent to Social Security reform. The graphics are mostly self-explanatory, but we include commentary on some of them where and when necessary. This week, we examine Progressive Indexing in Social Security- First, why pegging Social Security benefit growth to wages is causing such a headache:
Wages far outpace inflation. If, in the future, benefits grow based on inflation, you get the green bars. If they grow based on wage growth, you get the red bars. The problem is: THE SYSTEM CANNOT HANDLE THAT KIND OF GROWTH. Beginning just a dozen years from today, as the Baby Boom generation begins retiring in full force, Social Security will begin paying out more than it takes in. There is a structural deficit in Social Security that needs to be addressed at its root. Price indexing, according to many estimates, would wipe out nearly the entire unfunded liability of Social Security. But some believe it might leave the poorest of Americans behind. In comes progressive indexing, which is somewhere in the middle, between wage and price indexing. Progressive indexing slows the rate of benefit growth for the highest income earners, while preserving benefit growth pegged to wages for lower income earners:
According to Steve Goss, Chief Actuary of the Social Security Administration, this progressive indexing formula would wipe out around 3/4 of Social Security's long-term deficit (.pdf). The remaining solvency problem could be solved in a number of other ways. But won't this short-change people? Isn't this still a cut in benefits? Not at all. People will have the choice of contributing some of their payroll taxes to personal savings accounts, much like the Thrift Savings Plan (TSP) profiled last week. Through these personal accounts, which individuals, not the government, own, people will have the opportunity to earn compound interest, more than making up for the shortfall. The brilliance of personal accounts is that, on the individual level, a retiree will not notice a drop in benefits (in fact, he or she will almost certainly see larger benefits). In terms of getting a check in the mail (or a direct deposit), nothing changes. But, meanwhile, from the government's perspective, the benefits paid out are reduced enormously. It's a win-win. Gramps gets his check. The solvency crisis is averted. A major entitlement eats up less rather than more of the federal budget. More capital is put to use in the American free enterprise system. Everyone is happy. Yay. Source: The Joint Economic Committee of the United States Congress; Understanding Progressive Indexing (.pdf), April 27, 2005.
-Week One.
Posted by Will Franklin · 12 May 2005 10:09 AM CommentsEveryone is happy? I'm betting there's some politicians in DC with D's by their names that won't be. Their current position is "oppose because we can." Posted by: Hoodlumman at May 12, 2005 10:37 AM Not everyone is happy. I am so sick of those do nothing scum bags. I am sick of Joseph Biden and all the other worthless gang of theives!...Get something done you disgusting parasites! Posted by: Zsa Zsa at May 12, 2005 10:53 AM Grrrr...grrrrrr! Hmmm Posted by: Willbur at May 12, 2005 11:33 AM Anything the liberals can do to prevent any type of progress towards Social Security while the GOP is in the majority will be sure to be squashed. The American people need to address this during the next election. I am certain young Americans for the most part don't want to save the social security system. Register to vote and let them know they can't keep their jobs and continue doing nothing for partisan sake. This is not a partisan issue. Grrrrrr... Posted by: Willbur at May 12, 2005 11:52 AM Reform you numb skulls!... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at May 12, 2005 08:36 PM |