Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 117 -- U.S. GDP Growth. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 118 -- Interest Rates. » David Gregory's MEET THE PRESS Moment.![]() Time and time again, media figures fail to understand why the elite/establishment/mainstream media, collectively, is losing credibility-- and thus is losing readership/viewership. David Gregory on this week's Meet the Press blathered a bit on the Plame/Wilson quasi-scandal, proving yet again just how out-of-touch he is (underlining mine): MR. GREGORY: I do think that one--well, one point I disagree with Bill on is I agree that there should be a shield law, and this is an important conversation. But I think what has to accompany that is the debate we have within journalistic circles about when we promise confidentiality and whether it is to put a check on government or whether it is to be a vehicle for what may have been an egregious abuse of power here in smearing someone who's part of our national security apparatus, and I think journalists have to be very careful about this idea of confidentiality, and I'm a little bit troubled, and perhaps at the facts of this case, that there is not more of a national outcry on behalf of Judy Miller and on behalf of the facts of this case. There's not more of a national outcry on behalf of Judy Miller, because Americans have no respect for Judy Miller. Americans have no respect for The New York Times. And Americans have no respect for the media as a whole. Indeed, "Journalist" is one of the least prestigious jobs in the country. David Gregory, people don't like you, people don't trust your judgment, and people are fully aware that you and your colleagues constantly distort or misrepresent facts based on your ideological agenda. So, if we barely believe you when you report hard facts, why on earth would we believe your partisan preening, your faux outrage, your overbearing editorializing, and your hysterical rumor-mongering? Let me get this straight. First, you want us to believe that there is some sort of "egregious abuse of power here in smearing someone who's part of our national security apparatus," yet you are dismayed by the lack of a grassroots campaign to "Free Judy!" The networks still have enormous power and influence in setting the nation's agenda. But it's only a matter of time, as long as the self-important and hypocritical David Gregorys of the world populate the prominent network reporting positions, before Americans say "enough." Posted by Will Franklin · 24 July 2005 03:46 PM CommentsI thought NBC was one of the 'news' orgs that filed the amicus brief saying that no crime had been committed? Posted by: Conservative_D at July 24, 2005 04:03 PM Hence the growth of blogs. At least we bloggers don't pretend to be disinterested and neutral (heh at least I don't). Posted by: Am I A Pundit Now? at July 24, 2005 06:46 PM Gregory, like most MSM reporters and newsreaders, is a political pimp for the far left. His statements, as you have quoted, violate comon sense. They continue to believe that thier personal opinions are the absolute last word on all national issues. If they would simply report the news, as news reporters should do, they could begin to regain a small amount of the average american's confidence. Posted by: Eneils Bailey at July 24, 2005 07:31 PM I feel some sympathy for Ms. Miller, partly because her book about the 20th century history of the Middle East, God Has Ninety-nine Names, was so engaging. There's also a hilarious story about Col. Qadaffi making a pass at Ms. Miller. Posted by: Ben Lange at July 25, 2005 12:51 PM This is one of the worst kept secrets in journalism. Everyone knows David Gregory is a partisan hack and a shill for Howie Dean's latest talking points. The kind of mindless partisan crap that Gregory peddles belongs on The Huffington Post, not a network TV channel. Posted by: Ted Kennedy Stole Granny's Old Douche Bag at July 25, 2005 02:26 PM 1. Great work, Will. Always on the point. 2. Read my post - "Iraqi Prime Minister Teaches Journalism to Spinball" where David Gregory has no clue about the basics of the journalism. I could not believe it when i was watching the TV program. June 24, 2005 entry at
Posted by: David at July 26, 2005 08:12 PM 1. Great work, Will. Always on the point. 2. Read my post - "Iraqi Prime Minister Teaches Journalism to Spinball" where David Gregory has no clue about the basics of the journalism. I could not believe it when i was watching the TV program. June 24, 2005 entry at
Posted by: David at July 26, 2005 08:18 PM |