The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM
Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM
Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM
Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM
Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM
Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM
Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM
The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM
From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM
Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM
Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM
Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM
Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM
Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM
Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008
Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008
The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006
Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008
Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007
Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006
A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006
Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori
WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):
The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
Social Security: Franklin vs. Bismarck.
José Piñera (via Social Security Choice blog):
Otto von Bismarck, chancellor of Germany from 1871 to 1890, an aristocrat, a monarchist, and a Prussian nationalist, put in place the first social security system in 1889 in Germany. The U.S. Social Security Administration, on its website, traces its intellectual roots to Bismarck and to the 19th century European idea of the welfare state.
I'll go with Franklin over Bismarck any day.
Posted by Will Franklin · 6 July 2005 02:48 PM
I am with Ben...
Posted by: Zsa Zsa at July 6, 2005 07:30 PM
Will,...Do you see any family resemblence?
Posted by: Zsa Zsa at July 6, 2005 08:39 PM
You mean ... you're the long lost Zsa Zsa Franklin? This is bigger then the Limburg baby!!
Posted by: Rob B. at July 7, 2005 12:09 AM
Bismarck did a better job than you might suppose.
He was pioneering without the benefit of modern capital markets, computers, accurate statistics, and a century of experience which revealed the weaknesses of socialism.
The plan was simple and stable. It worked well when life expectancy was much shorter.
Franklin had the better ideas about wealth and society. But they depended upon a lifetime of stable investment in an era when banks and all other financial activity were not regulated, auditing was creative, and total collapses were common. Only the great depression brought reforms.
And even today we have Enrons.
I favor the SS reforms. Still I don't think it fair to dis Bismarck. Most countries got much worse leaders.
Posted by: Ken at July 7, 2005 01:02 AM
Isn't Social Security basically the Government saying that it's citizens aren't able to manage their own hard earned money?... It is sort of like an imposition of government upon every individuals right to own their own funds! The government is basically saying, The people are not responsible enough to invest their own money so we will invest it and ultimately tax it as much as possible!
Posted by: Zsa Zsa at July 7, 2005 08:46 AM