Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« London Wins 2012 Olympic Bid. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 100 -- Botswana. » Social Security: Franklin vs. Bismarck.José Piñera (via Social Security Choice blog): Otto von Bismarck, chancellor of Germany from 1871 to 1890, an aristocrat, a monarchist, and a Prussian nationalist, put in place the first social security system in 1889 in Germany. The U.S. Social Security Administration, on its website, traces its intellectual roots to Bismarck and to the 19th century European idea of the welfare state. I'll go with Franklin over Bismarck any day. Posted by Will Franklin · 6 July 2005 02:48 PM CommentsI am with Ben... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at July 6, 2005 07:30 PM Will,...Do you see any family resemblence? Posted by: Zsa Zsa at July 6, 2005 08:39 PM You mean ... you're the long lost Zsa Zsa Franklin? This is bigger then the Limburg baby!! Posted by: Rob B. at July 7, 2005 12:09 AM Bismarck did a better job than you might suppose. He was pioneering without the benefit of modern capital markets, computers, accurate statistics, and a century of experience which revealed the weaknesses of socialism. The plan was simple and stable. It worked well when life expectancy was much shorter. Franklin had the better ideas about wealth and society. But they depended upon a lifetime of stable investment in an era when banks and all other financial activity were not regulated, auditing was creative, and total collapses were common. Only the great depression brought reforms. And even today we have Enrons. I favor the SS reforms. Still I don't think it fair to dis Bismarck. Most countries got much worse leaders. Posted by: Ken at July 7, 2005 01:02 AM Isn't Social Security basically the Government saying that it's citizens aren't able to manage their own hard earned money?... It is sort of like an imposition of government upon every individuals right to own their own funds! The government is basically saying, The people are not responsible enough to invest their own money so we will invest it and ultimately tax it as much as possible! Posted by: Zsa Zsa at July 7, 2005 08:46 AM |