The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM
Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM
Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM
Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM
Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM
Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM
Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM
The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM
From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM
Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM
Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM
Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM
Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM
Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM
Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008
Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008
The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006
Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008
Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007
Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006
A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006
Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori
WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):
The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Twenty-Six -- AmeriSave.
Thursdays are good days for reform, because they fall between Wednesdays and Fridays.
That's why WILLisms.com offers a chart or graph, every Thursday, pertinent to Social Security reform.
This week's topic:
The Democrats' AmeriSave Non-Plan.
Democrats this week announced their plan for "retirement security" in America. It's called "AmeriSave."
It is awful.
Just dreadfully bad.
It is so horribly atrocious that it's hard not to break out in a hyena-like, cackling laugh, or vomit a little in your mouth. It's just hilariously dumb.
This is not hyperbole, either.
Many of the ideas in the plan are not entirely objectionable, and there are even some decent (if recycled and non-responsive) ideas. Indeed, Nancy Pelosi even (awkwardly) extolled the virtues of compound interest as she announced the plan:
"Our plan will expand and improve existing investment accounts, such as 401(k)s and IRAs, so that American families can benefit from compound interest while retaining Social Security's guaranteed benefit, creating a comprehensive retirement strategy" said Pelosi.
But in the end AmeriSave is a complete non-sequiter. It does nothing whatsoever to save Social Security.
It's sort of like those Geico commercials.
"I have great news!"
"I just saved a bunch on my car insurance!"
Well, fantastic for you. But what does that have to do with the price of tea in China?
Even if Democrats were serious about this AmeriSave business, Social Security's current trust fund surplus would still become a deficit in 2017, Social Security would still be unable to pay its promised benefits beginning in 2041, we'd still see the same miserable rate of return on the 1 out of every 8 or so dollars we earn that goes toward Social Security, and Social Security would still have an unfunded long-term liability of 11 trillion dollars.
In other words, the Democrats' AmeriSave plan is no plan at all. It's posturing, so as to avoid the appearance of complete do-nothingism and obstruction.
Here is the problem:
Here is what would happen to the problem if we pass AmeriSave:
Nothing. The Democrats' plan is not a plan. This is just so silly. Poor Americans are not going to participate in these AmeriSave accounts, because so much of their paycheck each month already goes toward Social Security payroll taxes.
Most Americans believe we need to have some sort of safety net for our elderly. No American who works his or her entire life should retire into poverty. But we don't need dogmatic adherence to a broken program to achieve that lofty aim. We need real, creative, pro-growth solutions.
What is so unfortunate is that in 2000, the Democratic Leadership Council (DLC), the once-moderate wing of the Democratic Party, (it seems, at least) endorsed meaningful Social Security reform (underlining mine):
An ever-growing share of the federal budget today consists of automatic transfers from working Americans to retirees. Moreover, the costs of the big entitlements for the elderly -- Social Security and Medicare -- are growing at rates that will eventually bankrupt them and that could leave little to pay for everything else government does. We can't just spend our way out of the problem; we must find a way to contain future costs. The federal government already spends seven times as much on the elderly as it does on children. To allow that ratio to grow even more imbalanced would be grossly unfair to today's workers and future generations.
That last point, creating retirement savings accounts for low-income Americans, is interesting. While vague enough to possibly mean "add-on" (rather than "carve-out") accounts, it's hard to argue with a straight face that poorer Americans are going to save for their own retirement on top of the mandatory amount they already pay into Social Security. What incentive is there for them to do so?
The above document, which could have been written by today's Social Security reformers, was signed by 73 elected Democrats at the time, including these high profile officials who remain in office:
U.S. Senators Evan Bayh (IN), John Kerry (MA), Mary Landrieu (LA), Joseph Lieberman (CT), and Blanche Lincoln (AR); U.S. Representatives Jim Davis (FL), James Moran, Jr. (VA), Allyson Schwartz (PA), Ellen Tauscher (CA); and Governors Janet Napolitano (AZ), Kathleen Sebelius (KS), and Tom Vilsack (IA).
Where is the leadership on this issue? Why have these Democrats allowed the DailyKos/MoveOn.org/Howard Dean wing of the party to "just say no" to crucial reform of a broken program, one that President Clinton declared a "crisis" numerous and distinct times?
It's well past time to reform Social Security. Let's get to it, right after the August recess.
The clock is ticking.
Previous Reform Thursday graphics can be seen here:
-Week One (Costs Exceed Revenues).
Tune into WILLisms.com each Thursday for more important graphical data supporting Social Security reform.
Posted by Will Franklin · 28 July 2005 02:14 PM
That is fine and dandy for them! They have a wonderful retirement program they voted for, for themselves!...The fleecing of America is alive and well with the Democrats plan for Americans retirement! SOCIAL INSECURITY call it what it is! These so called leaders are LEADING THE SHEEP TO THEIR SLAUGHTER...!
Posted by: Zsa Zsa at July 28, 2005 02:35 PM
One of the best RTs yet, Will.
Posted by: Hoodlumman at July 28, 2005 04:07 PM
You know, when I heard about the Dems "plan" for social security, then heard the details, I had a sneaking suspicion that this would be the topic for Reform Thursday. Thanks for proving me right.
Posted by: Giacomo at July 28, 2005 04:36 PM
So instead of private accounts for everyone, we have private accounts for some. That'll show them Bushies!
Posted by: McGroarty at July 29, 2005 10:49 AM