Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 142 -- U.S. Crime Rate. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 143 -- Air Travel. » Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Twenty-Nine -- Entitlement Growth.![]() Thursdays are good days for reform, because they fall between Wednesdays and Fridays. That's why WILLisms.com offers a chart or graph, every Thursday, pertinent to Social Security reform. This week's topic: Entitlement Spending Growth, Eating Away Ever More GDP. The Congressional Budget Office released its budget projections earlier this week, and on the front page of the 75-page document (.pdf) is the following graphic: ![]() The graph is found again in the body of the report. Why would the CBO's Budget and Economic Outlook feature such a graph on the front page, in lieu of a classic "cover page"? Well, because the entitlement crisis is real, and it is now (not "2041"). Social Security reform is not something that can be infinitely delayed. For all the whining and gnashing over the recent Highway Bill, let's put it into perspective, please. Entitlement spending is going to swamp the Federal Budget and put a damper on America's economic growth engine. And it's not rocket science. When Social Security was created, the demographic situation was drastically different. You had many workers supporting few retirees, collecting small benefits, for a short period of time. Today, you have proportionally fewer workers supporting many more retirees, who receive more benefits, for longer periods of time. Without serious reform to handle the changing demographics we face, we'll almost certainly have to raise taxes, to the detriment of the economy. Raising taxes, however, is not a permanent and self-sustaining solution. And it's something we've done far too much over the past seven decades. ![]() The history of raising the cap is no better. Raising the cap, rather than scaling back the growth in benefits, would also be a serious cop-out, particularly with no personal accounts to offset the tax hikes. Some otherwise intelligent conservatives, libertarians, and Republicans failed to get whole-heartedly behind Social Security reform, because they believed Medicare reform to be more imperative. How lame. And utterly foolish. Medicare and Medicaid reform will fail, guaranteed, if Social Security reform fails. Shame on those who played the "but that other problem is worse, so we shouldn't do anything about this problem" game. Does anyone really believe that railroading Social Security reform is the ticket to Medicare reform? I mean, it's just mind-boggling stupid. Because the conservative movement, including many Republican members of Congress, and including many of the conservative mega-bloggers, failed to coalesce behind the President on this tough, up-hill battle, we now face the likelihood of watered-down and/or delayed reforms. At this point, the most likely near-term outcome is the passage of "GROW Accounts." GROW Accounts, as noted previously, are a great step in the right direction. Politically, they will be nearly impossible for even the most cancerously obstructionist Congressional Democrats, to oppose. And policy-wise, they begin the legitimization of private accounts, while protecting the Social Security trust fund surplus that will exist over the next 10-12 years. The clock is ticking.
Previous Reform Thursday graphics can be seen here: -Week One (Costs Exceed Revenues). Tune into WILLisms.com each Thursday for more important graphical data supporting Social Security reform. Posted by Will Franklin · 18 August 2005 01:50 PM CommentsFor the full effect you can add a recording to this post with Pelosi and company saying something like, "Move along, nothing to see here, just move along". Posted by: Porkopolis at August 18, 2005 02:10 PM May God help us ... Posted by: la bona at August 19, 2005 09:29 AM Yes, Pelosi and company's only alternate given the absent of any meaningful reform is to raise taxes. To reform all entitlement programs will require such things as behaviorial changes, means testing, individual accounts, and restraint on the part of Congress' spending, just to name a few. Pelosi and her band of socialists will fight those things to the end. They know they must continue to rob those "greedy,selfish, American working taxpayers" to to keep thier "socially enlightened" constituency happy. Social spending is on the verge of making us just like most European socialistic nations. Posted by: Eneils Bailey at August 19, 2005 09:47 AM |