Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 149 -- Housing Bubble. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 150 -- Shrinking Unemployment Rate Race Gap. » Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Thirty -- Reform Is A Better Deal Than The Status Quo.![]() Thursdays are good days for reform, because they fall between Wednesdays and Fridays. That's why WILLisms.com offers a chart or graph, every Thursday, pertinent to Social Security reform. This week's topic: Social Security Reform: A Better Deal Than The Broken Status Quo. When Congress returns from recess in the coming weeks, they will take up the issue of Social Security reform. Right now, there is significant inertia behind GROW Accounts in the House of Representatives (.pdf). GROW Accounts should not be the ultimate goal of Social Security reformers, but they are a great first step. Here's why. Take a look at the problems with Social Security: For the next decade, there is a temporary surplus in the Social Security trust fund (which isn't really much of a trust fund). Suddently, after 2017, the surplus becomes a deficit. In the meantime, that surplus money is being raided by Congress to pay for highway pork-- and war-- and other projects Congress deems worthy at the moment. So why not pass something to stop the raid on the temporary surplus, putting the funds into personal accounts, owned by individual Americans? It is a no brainer. Stop the raid. It's also politically astute. It creates personal accounts, which will prove to the skeptics out there that "privatization" is far from a risky scheme. It will please elderly Americans who will not see a change in their benefits, paving the way for more significant reforms in the near future. And personal accounts are just a better deal than the broken status quo. Right down the road from me, in Galveston, Texas, the city took a "risky gamble" years ago, a gamble that paid dividends, literally. Galveston was one of a few cities in the early 1980s that opted out of Social Security in favor of personal accounts in the market: ![]() And it worked. Like clockwork. And it will work for the United States. Let's build some momentum behind more serious reform with GROW Accounts. And let's do it A.S.A.P. The clock is ticking.
Previous Reform Thursday graphics can be seen here: -Week One (Costs Exceed Revenues). Tune into WILLisms.com each Thursday for more important graphical data supporting Social Security reform. Posted by Will Franklin · 25 August 2005 09:42 PM CommentsToday's politicians on both sides of the aisles are a bit too in love with sticking their hands in the cookie jar to be so far-sighted as to advocate private ss accounts as a hedge against their own spending habits, I am afraid. Dammit, I wish someone in Congress was at least paying lip service to smaller government these days. Posted by: Am I A Pundit Now? at August 25, 2005 09:58 PM Term limits might cut that crap out, AIAPN. But job security is priority #1 for politicians. Posted by: Hoodlumman at August 25, 2005 10:14 PM Their job security? ...OR... ours? Posted by: Zsa Zsa at August 26, 2005 05:22 AM |