Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Twenty-Seven -- The Cost Of Doing Nothing. | WILLisms.com | Quotational Therapy: Part 33 -- Hayek On Social Security. » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 129 -- The Gender Gap.Gender Politics- The shrinking of the Democratic margin among women voters was the most important – and perhaps the least noticed – development of the 2004 election. In the two previous presidential campaigns, the Democratic candidate triumphed among women voters by 16 points (Bill Clinton) and 11 points (Al Gore). In contrast, John Kerry won women voters by a mere 3 points, 51 to 48 percent. Not only did the democratic candidate garner less support among women than in the past, but the overall size of the gender gap narrowed as Bush maintained a solid 11-point margin among men. The small gender gap is consistent with the results of the 2002 congressional elections, when Democrats and Republicans essentially broke even among women, in ontrast to 1998 and 2000 when congressional Democrats won women voters by 6 and 8 points respectively. ![]() To the extent that there is a "gender gap," it's specific to single women. Married women are on board with the Republican message. The next presidential candidate to win in a true landslide will need to bring that single white women number down below 50%, and keep the married white women under 40%. The shift in the female partisan loyalties becomes even more clear when looking at the more frequent Congressional elections. ![]() Interestingly, Republicans had a lousy showing with single white women in 1994, but still won an overwhelming mandate. Thus, it might be said that to the extent there is a gender gap, it hurts Democrats. Indeed, while Republicans certainly appreciate the soccer (or security) mom vote, the Democrats' "man problem" is far more significant than any "woman problem" Republicans face. ![]() Clearly, being married with kids is an important factor in party preference. An interesting demographic trend to watch may be the rise of (usually liberal) women in America choosing not to have children. If having children becomes a Republican-oriented activity, the political landscape could turn sharply against the Democrats in the next few decades, as parents tend to pass political and cultural values down to their children. Meanwhile, if married women with children turn against the GOP for whatever reason, it could mean serious trouble. Source: Previous Trivia Tidbit: The High-Performance United States Economic Engine. Posted by Will Franklin · 5 August 2005 08:30 AM Comments |