Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Wow, Just Speechless... | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 171 -- An Ownership Society Beckons. » Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Thirty-Three -- African-Americans Need A Better Deal.![]() Thursdays are good days for reform, because they fall between Wednesdays and Fridays. And reform is a long-haul process, not a fleeting event. That's why WILLisms.com offers a chart or graph, every Thursday, pertinent to Social Security reform. This week's topic: The Current Social Security System Is A Bad Deal For African-Americans. Astoundingly, in the wake of Hurricane Katrina, some on the left are arguing that this (and this) proves the failure of small government conservativism. Which is funny, considering how much entitlement spending has grown in the past several years. Only a left-wing partisan kook could look at the Katrina situation and conclude that: 1. The federal government (and only the federal government) failed miserably. It makes no sense. Hurricane Katrina could be yet another page in the book of evidence pointing to the necessity of an end to the stranglehold Democrats have on the African-American vote. But Democrats are not entirely clueless. They moved swiftly to politicize Katrina-- and make the alleged government failures about race. Some, such as Senator Hillary Clinton, are even claiming that this hurts the case for Social Security reform. To many liberals, stuck in the 1930s/1960s, reforming Social Security really means destroying it with no replacement or improvement or anything. It means leaving people out in the cold, on their own, with no retirement benefits. Every man fending for himself. Robbing the poor to pay the rich. "Fatcats" laughing all the way to the bank. And so on. It would have meant that the thousands of displaced Americans would have no Social Security check to count on in a time like this, they erroneously assert. But no plan put forth by President Bush or any other Republican in Congress does this, or anything remotely like it. Social Security reform is not about taking anything away from poor people, it is about empowering them. Social Security reform is about providing incentives for the poor to work, and save, and accumulate real assets, real wealth. The average African-American would receive much greater benefits under the President's plan than under the current system. For many liberals, though, if the benefit is not explicitly paid out by the government (and instead is paid by an interest-earning personal account), it doesn't count. It is important to note that, despite the progressive structure in the calculation of Social Security benefits, the average African-American woman receives far less in Social Security retirement benefits than a white woman. And not only that, but less African-American women receive Social Security retirement benefits (while more receive disability benefits) in the first place: ![]() Incentives at work. Or, not at work. But isn't Social Security supposed to be a poverty program? Or is it a retirement program? An insurance program? Who can even remember anymore. Incidentally, concerns about Social Security reform wrecking the disability claims of millions of sick and poor Americans are misplaced. Every Social Security reform plan on the table today keeps the disability portion of Social Security untouched. Right now, African-Americans in particular are getting the raw end of the stick on Social Security. Before it became a politicized, polarized partisan issue earlier this year, most African-Americans supported Social Security reform. After all, black Americans, like all Americans, must see that Social Security is a broken system. Not only is it a bad deal for poor and middle income individuals, sucking away opportunities to invest, build, and pass on wealth, but (and, perhaps, more importantly) Social Security is facing a demographic iceberg that threatens the entire American economy. Social Security reform (with personal accounts), however, would benefit poor minorities most of all, proportionally (.pdf): ![]() Poorer elderly Americans, rather than depending on a monthly check in the mail, paid out entirely at the discretion of Uncle Sam, would accumulate a nest egg they could pass on to their children and/or spouses. Rather than spending an hour of every 8-hour workday working just to contribute to a failing system with miniscule (or even negative) returns, Americans will be able to take the money earned during that hour and convert it into meaningful compound-interest-earning wealth. Let's get real, here. Poverty is way down in America. Wealth is up. Inflation is low. Interest rates are low. Crime is down. More people are working than ever before. Our economy is something to behold, and something nearly every country on earth could and should emulate. But in some communities, both rural and inner-city, poverty lingers. And it lingers in a big way. Despite a progressive benefit structure in Social Security (and exponential growth in other poverty entitlement spending), elderly African-Americans, many of whom may have worked their entire lives, still face poverty rates around 30%. And that's because the incentive structure is all wrong. It's also because we are robbing poorer Americans of the power of compound interest. The system, right now, is stacked against African-Americans: ...because of differences in life expectancies and marriage rates, on a life-time basis the income transfer from blacks to whites is as much as $10,000 per person. It makes no sense. And while the prospects of a comprehensive reform plan passing this year, or even next year, are not particularly great, the chances of GROW Accounts passing is exceedingly high. If you haven't been paying attention, GROW Accounts essentially take the surpluses the Social Security Trust Fund will run over the next decade and put them into personal account lockboxes. Lockboxes owned by individual Americans, not subject to the spending whims of Congress. Lockboxes that will prove to skeptics that personal accounts are nothing like gambling retirement away on the craps table. In the wake of Katrina, there are calls from many to fundamentally change the way the government works. I couldn't agree more. But let's apply proven and successful stimuli, not revert to antiquated and failed European-style socialism.
Previous Reform Thursday graphics can be seen here: -Week One (Costs Exceed Revenues). Tune into WILLisms.com each Thursday for more important graphical data supporting Social Security reform. Posted by Will Franklin · 15 September 2005 04:14 PM CommentsAll the more reason to get the Federal Government out of our lives! It doesn't benefit us to send our money to Washington and back. I am not saying no Federal Government! BUT the fed. gov. might just need to be down sized and State and local gov. might just need to have more authority!... Ask not what your country can do for you! BUT Ask what you can do for your country!...It seems too many of our citizens want to rely on the federal gov. to do everything for us! Posted by: Zsa Zsa at September 15, 2005 04:29 PM More than likely many Americans will mistakenly see this tragedy as an opportunity to expand the Fed. Gov. instead of reduce. Social Security reform is inevitable. It is too bad our liberal Senators etc. feel the need to rant and rave. Instead of seeing that important issues that concern all Americans are taken care of. I have seen partisan politics go way beyond the realm of what is good for our citizens. Accusations of the President being racist in this catastrophe by " leaders" of our country show a weak link in our leader's motives. S.S. reform is one of those political partisan issues that need to be done ASAP! Posted by: Sam at September 16, 2005 08:28 AM "Poverty is way down in America." Try: And: At: http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20050916-9999-1n16poor.html Apparently, there are no lies right wingers won't tell and none they won't swallow. Posted by: Phaedrus at September 16, 2005 10:10 AM |