Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 155 -- Strategic Petroleum Reserve. | WILLisms.com | Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Thirty-One -- Social Security A Burdensome Labor Cost. » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 156 -- U.S. Job Creation.American Versus European Job Creation- In the past couple of years, the American economy has added about 4 million jobs. The E.U. economies, meanwhile, have seen flat employment numbers. But what about the past three decades or so? Same general story. ![]() And taking a closer look at Germany, we can see that recessions drive unemployment upward, while stronger economic growth barely budges unemployment downward. ![]() The primary causes of sluggish job growth in Europe are high labor costs, both direct and indirect, both financial and otherwise. Many people think of labor costs strictly in terms of wages and direct benefits, but labor costs entail so much more. The cost of terminating an employee tends to be much higher in Europe than in the U.S., so employers are cautious in hiring people in the first place. Look at the coincidence between indirect labor cost growth and unemployment, in Germany. ![]() In 2002, the labor costs for a German industrial worker were 22% higher than an American worker; simultaneously, though, after-tax take-home pay in Germany was 16% lower in Germany than in the U.S. (not to mention that Germany is just more expensive than America, so an American wage goes further than a German wage). And the Germans are ready for some sort of change. Gerhard Schroeder continues to lag in the polls behind Angela Merkel in the upcoming German election. And Merkel has recently taken on the "Art Laffer of Germany," signalling she means to make very real changes in Germany's tired economy. Astonishingly, Germany is debating the flat tax idea with some seriousness. Whatever Germany-- and the rest of Old Europe-- do, they need to think about how indirect labor costs affect employment.
Previous Trivia Tidbit: Strategic Petroleum Reserve. Posted by Will Franklin · 1 September 2005 10:53 AM Comments |