Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Quotational Therapy: Part 42 -- Bush's First Inaugural. | WILLisms.com | Some Call It A Bonfire/Carnival Of Classiness... » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 161 -- Education.Academic Progress- First, the good news. ![]() Kids are taking more advanced math classes in school. Meanwhile, young kids have improved math scores significantly in recent years. ![]() Incidentally, reading scores are also significantly up over the past 5 or 6 years for 9-year-olds. And the racial gap has gotten smaller, as minorities have caught up somewhat, all while each individual group has improved. 13-year-olds also have improved their scores in recent years, but not as rapidly as 9-year-olds.
Now, let's think about why that could be the case. Why would scores, since 1999, improve for younger kids, but not for older kids? It could be an indictment of our entire education system. Even as more teens are taking high math, such as calculus, they aren't necessary soaking any of it in. Or, it could be evidence that No Child Left Behind (NCLB) actually works. After all, No Child Left Behind targets younger students almost exclusively. President Bush wants to expand No Child Left Behind to upper grades. Here's what I like about No Child Left Behind: 1. Accountability. But there needs to be more of it, so bad teachers can be fired, good ones paid more, and so on. Here's what I don't like: 1. Federalized. It is a large federal program. It takes away some local control. It is expensive. Etc. Fortunately, the administration does not seem stubborn or dogmatic on the issue, and is willing to make adjustments to improve the program. America's young kids score about the same or better than almost every other country on earth. By the time they graduate high school, they have fallen behind much of the rest of the world. Yet, our colleges and universities are the best in the world-- and the most plentiful. If the U.S. is to remain the preeminent global superpower, with the mightiest economy in the world, we must improve our nation's education system. But more money is not necessarily the answer. The U.S. already spends more per student on education than nearly every other country on earth. School choice is the optimal way to go. Force schools to compete with one another to be the best. No more complacency. No more NEA lockdown on the way schools are run.
Previous Trivia Tidbit: Supreme Court Nominations. Posted by Will Franklin · 6 September 2005 12:47 PM CommentsI've heard the same thing regarding complaints. The teachers I know either don't like it or manage but, like you, I am not a teacher and don't know enough about the intracacies to comment. Posted by: Hoodlumman at September 6, 2005 01:40 PM |