Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed


Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links

Blogroll Me!







Search



Archives

July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008

Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Thanks For The Memories | WILLisms.com | All great things must come to an end... »

Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 182 -- What Is Middle Class?

The Middle Class-

"Middle class" is an interesting term. Statistically, it refers to that middle 20% of income-earners (roughly $25,000-$42,000 per year), but culturally, it means so much more. If you ask just about any American to self identify based on "class" (itself such a nebulous, almost un-American concept), you'll unanimously hear some variation of "middle."

And that's because Americans, by and large, are not obsessed with class. Americans are not perpetually conscious and resentful and/or proud of class differences like citizens of some countries. And Americans making well over $42,000 per year, even over $100,000, may very well consider themselves solidly Middle Class (and with good reason).

Indeed, as The Tax Foundation notes:

Only 2 percent of U.S. adults consider themselves upper class, and fully 79 percent say they are lower-middle, middle, or upper-middle class.

Clearly, 4-out-of-5 Americans cannot be middle class, statistically. Haven't we been told that the middle is shrinking while the rich get richer and the poor get poorer?

Americans know better. Culturally, 4/5 of Americans are Middle Class, whether they fit neatly into that middle income quintile or not.

But class differences are effectively exploited in demagogic fashion by many on the left, even today. These Kucinich-types, who identify with Marx's view of a constant class struggle, with rigid and immobile class markers, are able to tap into a potent and dangerous stream of political support. But such support is ultimately shallow on the national stage, as most Americans believe in their own probability of upward mobility.

But let's take a look at the changing complexion of America's Middle Class. We can't make sound judgments about tax reform without understanding the true nature of "the middle class" in America.

As tax reform takes center stage, domestically, here's a prediction. We're going to hear quite a bit about "tax cuts for the wealthy" from Democrats. We're going to hear about how proposed tax reforms "benefit the rich at the expense of the middle class." We're going to hear it all.

So let's look at a few facts, first, about the changing nature of the typical American tax filer over the past few decades.

First, singles, unlike in 1960, are now by far the most common type of American taxpayer:

singles.gif

Now, note that the lower end of the tax scale coincides with more singles, while the higher end coincides with married couples:

Among the bottom 20 percent of taxpayers, 84 percent are single while just 16 percent are married. By contrast, 86 percent of those taxpayers in the top 20 percent are married while just 14 percent are single. As we’ll see later, many of these high-income married couples are simply dual-income. It’s easy to see that with two incomes, working couples appear twice as wealthy as single individuals.
incomesinglemarried.gif

This is an important development, and something to keep in mind when we hear the rhetoric from high-tax-loving Democrats about the rich not paying their fair share at the expense of working Americans. With two-income families becoming the norm among married couples, we're seeing two very much middle income folks joining their incomes and suddenly becoming part of that high-income quintile. It's hard to imagine two junior high school teachers, married to each other and filing their income taxes jointly, considering themselves "rich."

But that's precisely what many on the left would have us believe.

So, soaking the rich as a solution to all of our income tax problems may really mean that we're soaking solidly Middle Class Americans who just happen to be married.

Source:

The Tax Foundation.

-------------------------------------

Previous Trivia Tidbit: The Rich Pay Plenty In Taxes.

Posted by Will Franklin · 11 October 2005 12:17 PM

Comments

There you go.
I was explaining this to my wife just 2 days ago, minus the graphs which I'm going to show her. The tax rate hikes that they always propose never seem to adjust for joint filers in the calculation of whealth. Somehow I "magically" became rich in the left's eyes just by tying the knot.

Posted by: Rob B. at October 11, 2005 01:59 PM