Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 219 -- Perception Of Gasoline Prices. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day 220 -- Hurricanes & The American Economy. » Quotational Therapy: Part 59 -- Rumsfeld On Churchill.Rumsfeld On Churchill- ![]() I was reading a book last night, Winston Churchill, and he said the problem is not winning the war but persuading people to let them -- let him win the war, he said. Source: The most dreaded enemy for any General, President, Prime Minister, or Secretary of Defense running a military operation in our modern media era is... the modern media era. The United States can and will win in Iraq, and do it within a reasonable time frame (1-3 years), but only if we allow ourselves to win. For those who want to see democracy flourish in the Middle East, the most significant impediment is not Abu Musab al-Zarqawi or the Saudi royal family. It's the media. This isn't to say that we should begin censoring the media. Not at all. Our freedom is what makes us... us. But I would be willing to wager a lot of money that the frequency and intensity of terrorist attacks would fall dramatically without any media presence in Iraq. It's happened on a micro-level, within Iraq itself. Journalists leave a town, the town settles down. Over and over. Think about it. Clearly, the terrorists in Iraq have a strategy of making high profile attacks as close to the hotels of Western journalists as possible. It's just so obvious that the attacks are geared toward media coverage of the situation in Iraq. Imagine if Churchill had to deal with today's media during World War II? Previous Quotational Therapy Session: Ronald Reagan. Posted by Will Franklin · 18 November 2005 04:11 PM CommentsPresident Bush could really start using some Churchillian language these days. Simple gestures (such as when Churchill simply took pictures with firemen putting out fires from the Blitz during WWII) would really help to stir public support. He should stand by our troops more often, perhaps actually bring out some of America's patriotism. President Bush has a lot to learn from Winston Churchill. Posted by: Kevin W at November 18, 2005 04:34 PM Phil: Everyone responded to your same post over at Dr.Sanity's blog. It probably won't convince anyone here either. Posted by: onlineanalyst at November 19, 2005 02:12 PM Phil's back again, huh? Well, anyway, it's amazing how much the media stirs up trouble, just to have something to report. It creates a viscious cycle that puts the media in league with the terrorists and attracts attacks as wherever they're covering the attacks. I got a new word for the MSM: bait. Posted by: the paperboy at November 19, 2005 05:54 PM |