Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed


Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links

Blogroll Me!







Search



Archives

July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008

Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Pundit Roundtable | WILLisms.com | Quotational Therapy: Part 60 -- Prime Minister Tony Blair, On Freedom & Democracy. »

Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 222 -- U.S. Losing Its Low Tax Comparative Advantage.

The United States Needs To Lower Its Corporate Tax Rate-

Comparative advantage.

You may have heard of it.

Essentially, countries (or states, or cities...) compete with one another in the increasingly interconnected global marketplace, and those with advantageous business conditions relative to other countries tend to rise to the top. If goods or services can be produced more efficiently (cheaper, faster, better) in Zanbogo than in New Shariza, companies will choose to locate in Zanbogo. Zanbogo, all other things being equal, would have a comparative advantage over New Shariza.

It's not rocket science.

Let's think, then, about America's comparative advantages over other countries. Traditionally, the U.S. has had lower taxes, a highly skilled/educated workforce, proximity to our own thriving consumer market, an abundance of natural resources, a strong rule of law, less governmental corruption, and a variety of other advantages over other countries. On the other hand, America is a rampantly litigious society, with relatively strict environmental and labor regulations. These factors drive up the cost of doing business in the U.S.A.

But, as recently as a few years ago, relatively low taxes have been a defining trait of the American economy. Oddly enough, although President Bush has been fiercely committed to tax relief during his administration, the U.S. has slipped a bit in its corporate tax rate comparative advantage.

Other countries are catching on to the fact that globalization means economies do not exist in separate, sterile lab beakers. Countries must compete with each other, policy-wise, in order to lure (and/or keep) dynamic, job-creating, wealth-generating companies.

From 2000 to 2005, corporate tax rates around the world fell significantly, while remaining nearly unchanged in the U.S. (.pdf):

oecdnationstaxes.gif
After cutting 12 percentage points off its corporate tax rate in 1986, the U.S. rate stayed below the world average until 1994. That was the first effective year of the tax hike President Clinton signed into law a year after his election, the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, which added a new top rate of 35 percent. Since then, the top federal statutory U.S. rate has remained at 35 percent. Combined with an average state corporate income tax rate of 6.6 percent, which is deductible from federal taxable income, the overall rate of tax on corporate income is 39.3 percent in the U.S. Among our major trading partners, tax competition has driven the average rate down to 29.2 percent....

The clear trend among OECD countries is a move to cut corporate income tax rates to attract new investment. In fact, not one country
raised its corporate tax rate between 2000 and 2005. OECD countries have, on average, reduced their corporate tax rates by 13 percent
in this five-year period. Most notably, Germany, with the third highest corporate tax rate in the OECD, slashed its federal rate by 25.2 percent in five years. Other leaders in reducing corporate income tax rates include Ireland (a 47.9 percent rate reduction) and Iceland (40 percent).

To be sure, the U.S. has other advantages (even tax ones) over other countries, but do we really want to get left behind by the global corporate tax cuttimng phenomenon? Does the U.S. actually want to become a high tax haven?

Source:
The Tax Foundation (.pdf).

-------------------------------------

Previous Trivia Tidbit: Smoking.

Posted by Will Franklin · 21 November 2005 05:38 PM

Comments