Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« I LIKE WILLisms.com. | WILLisms.com | Some Call It A Bonfire (Or Carnival) Of Classiness... » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 244 -- Affordable College Education, Red States & Blue.Red State, Blue State- In the past, WILLisms has noted that taxes are generally lower in red states (ones that Bush won in 2004) than blue states (ones that Kerry won in 2004). This is not so surprising. What might have been slightly more surprising to you was that GDP growth, job creation, and a variety of other economic indicators were substantially stronger in red states than blue. But, wait, there's more. And this shouldn't come as that much of a surprise, either, but public colleges and universities in blue states are becoming ridiculously expensive, while public schools in red states are relatively affordable. The data, thanks to Viking Pundit:
Go check out the rest of the list, and more comments here. Now, there could be a little of the "you get what you pay for" in these numbers. Indeed, the money floating around the more expensive public schools might somewhat arbitrarily (or legitimately) boost the rankings in those magazines high school seniors (and their parents) pay so much attention to. But what's the deal, here? Consistently, everything costs so much more in the blue states. Houses, cars, food, electricity, college, taxes... just about everything. So although blue state median incomes are certainly higher, and blue state taxes are higher, the cost of living just eats away at that income. Don't liberals tell us that affordable education requires higher taxes? So shouldn't higher taxes produce affordable public education, for more individuals? I hear all the time that all Texas needs to do is implement an income tax (we don't have one) and it could fully fund its public elementary, middle, and high schools. Easy as pie. There wouldn't be any budget crises, if Texas just got with the program, joined the civilized world, and added an income tax. But, again, as noted before, states with income taxes have far more budget crises than states without them. So, let's review: Despite higher taxes, blue state colleges charge more from students. What am I missing here? Previous Trivia Tidbit: Katrina Killed Mostly Old People. Posted by Will Franklin · 13 December 2005 10:25 AM CommentsYou should know, Will, that Durham New Hampshire is a decidedly blue town in a purple state. Here's the voting from Durham in the last presidential election In a state with 32% Republicans and 25% Democrats, Kerry won Durham by about 3000 votes, and carried the state by only 9000 votes. Why? Durham is where UNH sits. BTW, you don't get what you pay for at UMass. That state university is little more than a liberal warrior indoctrination center. Posted by: Giacomo at December 13, 2005 10:54 AM As a PSU alumnus I can state a pretty simple reason that Penn State is at the top of the list; it isn't an entirely public university. Penn State is actually "state related" and receives fewer than 20% of its funding from the State of Pennsylvania. Can't explain the other 4 though. Posted by: Connard at December 13, 2005 06:15 PM The Holy Spirit's messages on The Christian Prophet blog indicate that taxation can be viewed as theft or slavery. Why would somebody talk about "getting what they have paid for?" I don't think the Holy Spirit is totally anti-government, but seems to warn against government worship and favors voluntary funding in the way that churches are required to be funded voluntarily. Posted by: A Christian Prophet at December 13, 2005 06:46 PM |