Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Wednesday Caption Contest: Part 38. | WILLisms.com | Can You Hear Me Now, Osama? » "Have You No Sense Of Decency?"There is debate at the Volokh Conspiracy as to whether Ted Kennedy's technique of guilt-by-association against Samuel Alito evokes a valid analogy to Joseph McCarthy's disgrace at the Army-McCarthy hearings. Here is Joseph Welch's famous rebuke to Joseph McCarthy at those hearings on June 9, 1954:
What was Ted Kennedy attempting to do today, other than to assassinate Sam Alito's character by charging him with responsibility for every statement made by Concerned Alumni of Princeton? Todd Zywicki's analogy is chillingly apt: Kennedy's clumsy accusation was entirely within the spirit of inquisition McCarthy was attempting to use against Fred Fisher, for having once been a member of the Lawyer's Guild. Many Leftists are no doubt clucking tonight that this represents some kind of victory for them, not realizing that they have become the new John Birchers of the age. P.S. - One wonders if any single Democrat will have the decency to extend an apology to Mrs. Alito. Michelle Malkin asks the same question. Posted by Ken McCracken · 11 January 2006 10:02 PM CommentsGod bless Mrs. Alito! ...Having to listen to those doofuses badger her husband must be pure torture!... I still think Ted Kennedy should not be allowed to hold office let alone be questioning a Supreme Court candidate!... I really believe Teddy should just now be getting out of JAIL!... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at January 12, 2006 10:07 AM By all means, we should have Kennedy lecture us on minorities and women, all of whom he cares about, unless he's drunk and they are at the bottom of the river. Posted by: Rob B. at January 12, 2006 10:31 AM Not to mention his ex-wife (Joan) has been found drunk and broke out on the street... Yep, Ted is a fine citizen! NOT!!!... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at January 12, 2006 11:30 AM And just to complete the irony, one of McCarthy's most valued aides was a young lawyer, fresh out of law school, named Robert F. Kennedy... J. Posted by: Jay Tea at January 12, 2006 12:33 PM . . . who used wiretaps against people such as Martin Luther King, Jr., for example. The irony of it all is rather rich. Posted by: Ken McCracken at January 12, 2006 01:13 PM Who is J Edgar Hoover and Robert Kennedy? ... Ken was that a Jeopardy question?... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at January 12, 2006 08:02 PM Also Nixon and bobby kennedy to boot. But do some research on Mccarthy and the venona (think that is spelled right) papers very interesting stuff. Alot of misleading info about mccarthy is out there. Posted by: christian at January 12, 2006 08:49 PM Also it is interesting that mcarthy rejected four previous requests by democrates to make the hearings public and announce names instead of just numbers. He stated, "if I were to give all the names involved, it might leave a wrong impression. If we should label one man a communist when he is not a communist, I think it would be too bad." Was he perfect, no, is he being twisted and his name slandered by the public academia, you bet. Posted by: more at January 12, 2006 08:58 PM |