Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 252 -- Mining Accidents & Blaming Bush. | WILLisms.com | Quotational Therapy: Part 69 -- President Bush's 2003 State Of The Union Address. » Let The Silliness Begin!Many on the right predicted this sort of argument in the wake of the latest bin Laden tape. Sorry, you do not get a Blogging Bronze Star for predicting this, it was utterly inevitable. I agree with one point though, we need to find out what terms Osama is offering. Why? All the better to find him and kill him, that's why. Posted by Ken McCracken · 29 January 2006 07:33 PM CommentsWhat were the terms? ... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at January 29, 2006 09:03 PM Bin Laden is in no more of a position to offer a truce than the Palestian Authority is. Posted by: thomas at January 29, 2006 09:31 PM You give a whiny kid candy, they'll continue to be whiny kids. You give into the terms of terrorists, they'll continue to kill innocent people. Anyone who would suggest a truce with these killers needs to look at the news footage from the days following 9/11/01. Posted by: Bob at January 30, 2006 07:42 AM Terrorists, by definition, do not adhere to the rules of war. Only the biggest morons of our time would think that these same people would honor a truce of any type. Posted by: Hoodlumman at January 30, 2006 08:03 AM The Right Place has a caption contest this week with Osama!... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at January 30, 2006 08:53 AM "appeasement makes the aggressor more aggressive" So to end the suffering of the Iraqi/Afghan people whe sould put Bin Laden and the Taliban in charge. Wow, and that person probably has a college degree, maybe they can get a refund. Posted by: christian at January 30, 2006 11:21 AM I can't imagine Osama or Zawi would be very good at setting terms for a truce! ... And I certainly can't see Osama and GW shaking hands and signing any type of peace treaty! At least not anytime soon... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at January 30, 2006 12:28 PM "I certainly can't see Osama and GW shaking hands and signing any type of peace treaty! At least not anytime soon..." Ms. Gabor, certainly you must be joking. No president would ever sign a peace treaty much less shake the hand of a mass murderer. That is preposterous. Posted by: thomas at January 30, 2006 02:55 PM Maybe when Hell freezes over?... Posted by: Zsa Zsa at January 30, 2006 06:30 PM I am sure that George and Osama will both be there, so that is a possibility. Posted by: thomas at January 31, 2006 07:50 AM |