Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Quotational Therapy: Part 67-- Martin Luther King, Jr. | WILLisms.com | Wednesday Caption Contest: Part 39. » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 249 -- Agricultural Subsidies & Tariffs.Free Trade = Good For Poor Farming Countries- Hey, hippies, listen up. We need you over here. You've got something very wrong. Your anti-WTO, anti-trade, anti-markets type stuff just isn't cutting it anymore. Want to help the poor, downtrodden, pre-industrial people of the world? Get rid of agricultural subsidies. Get rid of them in the United States. More importantly, get rid of them in the European Union (where the subsidies are MUCH more outrageous than in the United States). Meanwhile, free up other barriers to agricultural trade, and you will see third world countries fending for themselves. The likely total annual economic benefit to the world in 2015 from efficiency gains and investment growth that would result from full agricultural liberalization from 2005 through 2010 is in the range of roughly $50 billion to $185 billion (measured in 2001 dollars), or 0.1 percent to 0.4 percent of the value of world output of all goods and services. Expanding the analysis to include the effects of liberalization on the rate of productivity growth can raise the estimates by amounts ranging from 50 percent to more than 100 percent, depending on the study. The best international economic aid program is the end of farm subsidies in Europe and America. And free trade. Source: More on the elimination of barriers, such a no-brainer: The World Bank estimates that free agricultural trade would provide benefits of an additional $248bn: $106 billion would accrue to the rich world, $142 bn to the poorer world. Of that $142bn, $31bn would come from wealthy countries’ barrier removal (internal subsidy support and quota limit system removal) and a staggering $111bn from poor countries removing barriers between their own countries--and that is partly because barriers are far higher between poor countries than with the West. Poor countries also trade a great deal with each other. In other words the largest trade gains are with barrier removal and between the poorer countries of the world. TRADE, NOT AID. ![]()
Previous Trivia Tidbit: Meanest Cities To Homeless People. Posted by Will Franklin · 17 January 2006 11:04 AM CommentsSo Bush is a hippy. Interesting. WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush signed a 10-year, $190 billion farm bill Monday that expands subsidies to growers, turning aside criticism from fellow Republicans who called the measure a budget-busting step backward in agriculture planning. It increases spending by nearly 80% over the cost of existing programs at a time when government and private analysts are projecting a budget deficit this year of $100 billion or more. The president has been calling on lawmakers to show fiscal restraint. http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2002/05/13/farm-bill.htm Just blame everything on the Democrats. I am sure you will find some people who are unaware that the government is run by the GOP. Posted by: thomas at January 18, 2006 07:46 AM If there is one shortcoming of the studies it is that only one of the 5 studies used by the CBO was a dynamic analysis. Still most US farmers today, as 30 years ago, would gladly give up any subsidies as long as all nations would do the same and drop their tariffs as well. For more than 30 years, most farmers believed they would be better off if the world markets were totally free and open. I do not have a blog so follow the link http://www.hicsq.net/JGsez/farmsubs.htm for more of my comments. Posted by: JG at January 18, 2006 06:40 PM |