Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed


Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links

Blogroll Me!







Search



Archives

July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008

Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 255 -- Costly Tax Compliance. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 256 -- Effectiveness Of Abortion-Related Legislation. »

Question For The Vichy Democrats

How do you like being called nazi collaborators by the Online Left, by the way?

You know who you are. You are the people in the Democratic Party that feel that listening in on al-Qaeda operatives is a good idea, and that we can't cut and run from Iraq.

You don't see Joe Lieberman as a horrid traitor to his party, and you remember a party that once welcomed people like Scoop Jackson or Zell Miller.

Maybe you winced a bit watching the Alito hearings.

You'd better not complain, just suck it up. After all, these folks control the purse strings of your party now. They want to make the idea of a moderate Democratic party 'radioactive' by heaping scorn on the DLC.

Do you want them to take you down yet again this fall?

P.S. speaking of the Loony Left, if Cindy Sheehan has lost her First Amendment rights, why am I hearing about her losing them?

Posted by Ken McCracken · 2 February 2006 09:01 AM

Comments

How do you like being called Communist Traitors by the Online Right, by the way?

You know who you are. You are the people in the Republican Party that feel that the FISA law was written for a reason and you do not feel the president is given dictatorial powers by the constitution.

You don't see Olympia Snowe as a horrid traitor to her party, and you remember a party that once welcomed people like James Jeffords or David Dreier.

Maybe you winced a bit when the President had the audacity to call the grandfathering of pollution restrictions to yet unbuilt new power/chemical plants, the Clean Air Initative.

You'd better not complain, just suck it up. After all, these folks control the purse strings of your party now. They want to make the idea of a moderate Republican party 'radioactive' by heaping scorn on anyone who dare question any Presidential directive, no matter how illegal it may be.

Is it worth selling your soul to the Devil to keep a majority in the House and Senate?

Posted by: thomas at February 2, 2006 09:20 AM

Umm.... Thomas? "Communist Traitors" is out of fashion, has been for years. Our intra-party squabble is with "RINOs" now. And it's not quite as vitriolic as you would like it to be, it just means "Republican in Name Only". I mean really... in order to be an incisive thrust, your idea has to have some merit. Not only are we not passing acid on our more squishy Republicans, but our Party is not controlled financially by the extreme anything. Oddly enough, the Republican Party is financed by tons of small donations made by a huge slice of America, not by a few well heeled financiers. Take a deep breath... it's only Thursday.

It must be a really tough time to be a Democrat.

Posted by: Mr. Michael at February 2, 2006 09:26 AM

Hey Thomas, here's a newsflash for you.

Its the Democratic Party that is being torn in two right now, not the Republican Party.

And by the way, its Republicans who have been winning elections lately.

The Democrats need far more introspection than the Republicans do, I would say, unless of course you guys actually like losing.

Posted by: Ken McCracken at February 2, 2006 09:42 AM

Scoreboarding is always fun.

And it will continue to be fun this November, as well.

Posted by: Hoodlumman at February 2, 2006 09:51 AM

Oh yes, the party is solid as a rock. How many plea deals, convictions, resignations, indictments, investigations are in progess? I hope you do think your house is in order.

Posted by: thomas at February 2, 2006 09:55 AM

Well ask Harry Reid about that.

He seems to be in the thick of it.

Posted by: Ken McCracken at February 2, 2006 09:58 AM

Let's just see who is delivered and indictment and who is not. The standard line that this is a Democrat scandal too is only going to last until then.

Posted by: thomas at February 2, 2006 10:46 AM

I think it is great! Any disgruntled democrates out there, come on over, again, in 06'. Funny thing is Dem's need a scandle to win not a message or plan.

Posted by: christian at February 2, 2006 11:07 AM

Yes. We all see how truly devastating the Plame scandal was for the administration.

And this NSA disaster. The humanity...

This Abramhoff thing will definitely be the final nail in the coffin.

We've been hearing stuff like this for six years.

Six. Years.

Posted by: Hoodlumman at February 2, 2006 11:22 AM

Vichy?
Sorry, I missed the reference.

I'd love for the Democrats to take up an opposing plan. That would be great. Two oxen going forward, one right and one left is still some forward movement.

One OX going forward and one going backward saying "That won't work, That won't work" while getting drug along, isn't helping anyone.

Why don't we start that contrasting debate on the fun subject of say... Social Security reform?

Whadda ya say?

Posted by: Rob B. at February 2, 2006 12:10 PM

You're right, Hood.

"Scoreboard!"

Posted by: Will Franklin at February 2, 2006 01:53 PM

Here is how republicans won in 04. and I do admit, it is brilliant. Get a homophobic referendum in every swing state to make sure you can rally all of the good christians out there to vote. It was brilliant I admit.

Posted by: thomas at February 2, 2006 04:56 PM

Actually we have to credit the pro-homo unions for pushing that gay marriage thing to the fore-front in the news. Opportune timing.

Posted by: Rob B. at February 3, 2006 02:09 PM