Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Wednesday Caption Contest: Part 43. | WILLisms.com | Great Aphorists: Ludwig Von Mises » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 269 -- Tax Code Complexity.Huge Tax Code Has Huge Consequences- Last year, American businesses, individuals, and nonprofit organizations spent 6 billion hours doing their taxes. It also cost Americans more than a quarter of a trillion dollars just to comply with their taxes. And it cost lower income folks more than wealthier folks to comply with the labrynthine tax code, on a relative basis: When examined by income level, compliance cost is found to be highly regressive, taking a larger toll on low-income taxpayers as a percentage of income than high-income taxpayers. On the low end, taxpayers with adjusted gross income (AGI) under $20,000 incur a compliance cost equal to 5.9 percent of income while the compliance cost incurred by taxpayers with AGI over $200,000 amounts to just 0.5 percent of income. Flatter, simpler tax code, anyone? "Progressives" would solve this problem by sticking it to the rich and/or just raising the heck out of taxes and taking away those increasingly complicated deductions everyone loves (mortgage, etc.). The rest of us would gladly support major tax reform, making our tax code extremely simple and straightforward, to avoid this (.pdf): ![]() Flatter, simpler, lower. It's worked before. It'll work again. Source: The Tax Foundation(.pdf). Stay tuned for more on America's tax code, as we near April 15. Previous Trivia Tidbit: Windfall Taxes? How About Not. Posted by Will Franklin · 15 February 2006 03:35 PM Comments |