Buy WILLisms Contact Ken XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 1, 2005 3:12 PM June 10, 2005 2:18 PM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM Feb. 23, 2006 10:50 AM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM Blogroll Me! May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 Feb. 15, 2007 Due: May. 1, 2007 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 2, 2007 November 13, 2006 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com April 2007 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Kool-Aid Is For The Kos Kult | WILLisms.com | Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Forty-Seven (Our Aging Population). » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 277 -- Democrats Cozier With Lobbyists Than Republicans.Culture Of Hypocrisy- Democrats are staking their 2006 fortunes on their ability to convince voters that there is an unprecedented culture of corruption in Washington today, instigated solely by Republicans. It's not going to work, because it makes no sense whatsoever, and people know it. The culture of hypocrisy is alive and well, though. Our friends on the left are engaging in a bit of psychological projection, as well as denial. It's projection, because the claim is that Republicans only enact legislation if big money (perhaps from a lobbyist) lines their pockets. In other words, Republicans have no principles and just act as coin-operated automatons, serving whichever special interest master puts in the most quarters. What is so odd about this argument is that the GOP is clearly more of a cohesive ideological and philosophical unit, with some definite exceptions, while the Democratic Party is far more of a hodge-podge amalgamation of contradictory and conflicting special interests. It's also denial from the Democrats, because they get so much more "big money" than Republicans do. The GOP fundraising advantage comes from lots of relatively small, hard-dollar donations from middle class folks. A thousand here, fifty there, a couple hundred there. Lots of them. And they add up. Republicans also get donations from special interests, to be sure, but these campaign dollars pale in comparison to the special interest money on the other side of the aisle. Democrats, meanwhile, rely on ridiculous amounts of soft-dollar help from a few ultra-wealthy individuals, funneled through 527 organizations. Money from labor unions and trial lawyers also provide the backbone of the DNC money magnet. Labor unions: ![]() Okay, so, yeah, unions force their members to give to left-wing causes. Honestly, I am only outraged at this sort of thing commensurate with the level of hypocrisy Democrats display about GOP campaign money.
![]() Some people, though, don't view "big trial attorney" money the same way they view lobbyist money. So how about a breakdown of lobbyists, exclusively. Just Lobbyists: ![]() Indeed, Democrats have zero room for rhetoric on lobbyist money, on soft money, or any other kind of special interest money: Since the 1990 election cycle, Democrats have accepted more than $53 million from lobbyists while Republicans have taken more than $48 million for their election campaigns, according to the Center for Responsive Politics. That's a pretty reasonable argument. Lobbying dollars have obviously gone up substantially in recent years, but it is interesting that the percentages of dollars going to Republicans since the 1994 takeover of Congress are often not even as high as the percentages of Republicans in Congress. For example, the lobbyist money broke down like so: 2004 campaign cycle: 48% Democrats, 52% Republicans. When Democrats ran the place, they took in lobbyist money (not even counting trial lawyer money) in proportions far exceeding their majorities. Now that Republicans run the place, they don't even take in as much cash, relative to their majority status. Just to be fair to the Democrats, let's look at "big oil," the source of all big money evil if we are to believe Nancy Pelosi and friends: Oil & Gas: ![]() 1. How many Democrats represent oil and gas producing regions (think Texas, Louisiana, Alaska, Oklahoma, California, etc.) in Congress? Probably less than 25%. 2. Notice how small the oil and gas industry's political money footprint is compared to labor unions and trial attorneys. For that matter, notice how small lobbyist money is in comparison to labor and legal money. The "culture of corruption" assertions from Democrats are hilarious, in that they are clearly projecting their own insecurities about their own "big money" onto the GOP. The large donations the Democrats receive simply dwarf the donations the GOP receives. Denial is more than a river in Egypt. It's also the source of the "culture of hypocrisy" the Democrats have taken to a whole new level with regards to this "culture of corruption" business. Source: The Washington Times & The Center for Responsive Politics. Previous Trivia Tidbit: Health Care Spending WAY Up. Posted by Will Franklin · 23 February 2006 10:50 AM CommentsOuch! Posted by: christian at February 23, 2006 11:31 AM It stings! Posted by: Hoodlumman at February 23, 2006 12:58 PM Ouch! It stings and it stinks. Posted by: Dan Morgan at February 23, 2006 09:31 PM Soon the unions will a thing of the past as well as the Democrats' influence. I overheard a person say yesterday that union dues are deductable. They have not for at least the last five years. Posted by: Chief RZ at February 24, 2006 12:20 PM |