Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed


Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links

Blogroll Me!







Search



Archives

July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008

Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Spam Your Way To Riches The Nigerian Way | WILLisms.com | Quotational Therapy: Part 82 -- When Ridiculous Increases In Spending Still Aren't Enough. »

Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 299 -- Media Implosion.

Establishment Media Weakness-

For a panoply of reasons, America's traditional establishment media sources are struggling.

Newspaper circulation is relatively flat since 1970, even as the number of American households has essentially doubled:

newspapercirculationnotkept.gif

In recent years, it looks even worse for newspapers, as readership has declined in a meaningful way:

readershipofnewspapersdown.gif

Meanwhile, network television news viewership has also suffered:

networktvnews.gif

The reasons for the decline are many. The elitist, out-of-touch, left-wing bias in the establishment media, sometimes imagined, usually real, is a big part of the decline. The major establishment media tend to be more left-wing, more hostile toward religion, more pro-Democrat (and anti-Republican), more skeptical of American values and power and exceptionalism, more blue state oriented (more likely to appreciate gay cowboy movies and college protests than real cowboy movies and college football), and more socialist than most American media consumers.

Meanwhile, alternative media sources, such as talk radio, cable news, and blogs have taken a bite out of the collective establishment media's share of the news market. Americans are increasingly empowered to get their news and information from sources that are more ideologically similar to themselves.

It's fascinating that the folks charged with reporting trends and events and other news in our world could be so oblivious to (and often in denial about) the reasons for their own decline.

-------------------------------------

Previous Trivia Tidbit: The Irony Of Blue States.

Posted by Will Franklin · 17 March 2006 12:21 PM

Comments

what's so weird about this decline is that the msm could slow it merely by being less leftist. if they did away with their leftist bds bias and became even-handed in their reporting, then they would get a larger audience simply becauise all of us centrists and righties would partake of them once in a while.

case in pint: msnbc is the lowest rated cable news net. they routinely run un-scientific polls. and trhese are always slanted 3-to-1 left-to-right.

now we know that the nation is right now a 52-48 RIGHT-to-left nation, so the msnbc results mean that they can attract leftist viewers but not many right-of-center viewers. they get only 25% of the people on the right.

if they were not so biased their ratings could DOUBLE - and this would make them LOTS MORE MONEY.

yet still they do not so it.

WHY!?

they obviously put their propaganda efforst ahead of their SHAREHOLDERS profit interests.

their SHAREHOLDERS shouold be going nuts over this; it's an OUTRAGEOUS situation.

one that violates the spirit of objectivity in news-reporting and hurts msnbc's/nbc's/ge's profitability.

fix get more viewers because it is fair and balanced.

and i am NOT defining centrist or rightist or leftist in any ideoloogical way; i'm just using a "bell curve" implied from the make up of congress and the last several presidential elections. YUP: REMEMBER: CLINTON WAS NOMINATED AND ELECTED AS A NEW DEMOCRAT - A CENTRIST.

this sutation is self-correcting: the leftist rags/channels will go out of business.

the problem remains: as they go into death throes, they will get more desperate - like the rather/memogate stuff.

the dubai demagoguery and the IMMINENT?VERGING civil war are two other examples of UTTER BS sp[ewing from the leftist MSM as they lie and lie and lie and lie in an effort to BRAINWASh to public.

between the msm's nonstop assault of LIES, and bush's own failure to be conservative enough (on spending and immigration), things are pretty tough now for the prez.

but let's not bail out on him.

the alternative is too sickening. appallingly so.

Posted by: reliapundit at March 17, 2006 03:38 PM

The mainstream media has become (1) a mouthpiece for the American left; and (2) a round-the-clock foghorn for stories that really aren't national stories at all, like the poor girl who was murdered in Aruba. Yes, the story deserved to be reported but there has been nothing new of consequence in months even though I see entire shows (FOX is one of the worst) devoted entirely to her every night.

I hate to say it, but it's news when pretty, white, young women are murdered but it's not news when not-so-hot-looking, non-white women are murdered.

The media is in total denial and will be until The New York Times and the Washington Post are both in bankruptcy court.

Stingray:  a blog for salty Christians

Posted by: Stingray at March 17, 2006 09:16 PM

It's a given that the daily newspapers lean left, but the reason for it is misunderstood. Consider the following set of facts about the business (and don't forget, newspapers ARE businesses):
1) there is a straight-line relationship between revenue and verifiable (paid) circulation. (What advertisers pay for an add is a multiple of how many doorsteps the paper falls on.),
2) about 95% of households in non-marginalized neighborhoods of cities subscribe,
3 about 50% of households in neighborhoods of the marginalized subscribe, ergo
4) If you wish to increase circulation (increase revenue, which, because expenses are fixed, falls straight to the bottom line) where do go to find new customers?
5) Therefore "stories" (Jesse Jackson speakes here, welfare proposed in Congress, etc.) are selected, not for news value, but as marketing devices.
CONCLUSION: This isn't liberal bias. This is PROFIT BIAS. It is an outmoded business model, perhaps, but its not the only U.S. industry that can't change its culture overnight (think GM, Ford, for instance).

Posted by: Ty Knoy at March 18, 2006 04:38 PM