The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM
Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM
Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM
Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM
Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM
Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM
Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM
The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM
From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM
Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM
Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM
Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM
Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM
Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM
Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008
Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008
The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006
Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008
Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007
Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006
A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006
Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori
WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):
The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
Amnesty for Terrorists?Officials in Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's government announced an amnesty plan for terrorists:
The plan, quickly and mysteriously released and rescinded by the prime minister's office last week, calls for a prisoner release and pardons for those "not proven guilty in crimes and clear terrorist activities" and a review of the process by which former members of Saddam Hussein's Baath Party are removed from public life.The plan includes an organization that has shades of South Africa's Truth and Reconciliation Commission or El Salvador's Comisión de la Verdad:
The amnesty plan, which apparently includes many insurgents who have staged attacks against Americans and Iraqis, calls for the creation of a national committee and local subcommittees to welcome insurgents and begin a "truthful national dialogue in dealing with contradicting visions and stances," according to a version of the plan published in an Iraqi newspaper yesterday.What seems oddest about this is that most domestic opposition comes from Democrats on this issue. I don't get it - they vociferously opposed Bush's de-Ba'athification plan, and much of the Democrats' leadership have been preaching cut-and-run and other linguini-spined positions - so this sudden on-cue 'tough guy' approach seems most out of character indeed. Perhaps, like a stopped clock, they occasionally lurch into the truth in spite of themselves.
Posted by Ken McCracken · 19 June 2006 02:35 PM
It's like candy to a toddler. The chance to pin a tag on someone for "amnesty to those who have killed our soldiers" is too delightful an opportunity to pass up. It has such a nice ring about it.
Never mind that it may be the most realistic idea advanced since the start of the war to bring a lot people into the democratic fold who will otherwise continue in isolated, angry, military opposition.
If you think about it, it isn't our call. Amnesty for former adversaries is an Iraqi, not American option. One way to force the pill on Washington would be to blame those ungreatful, turncoat Iraqis. How dare they advance such a radical democratic agenda after all we have sacrificed!
Posted by: Hootsbuddy at June 19, 2006 05:00 PM
Those are great points.
I think the Democrats have shown that they are about nothing except scoring political points, and certainly don't really care about winning in Iraq.
Losing, in fact, fits their agenda much better.
Posted by: Ken McCracken at June 19, 2006 08:44 PM
Tragically it's much more simple.
Because the Bush supported Iraqi government suggests it as a way to end the conflict the (D)'s must oppose it to further the cause of defeat.
It is a 'lose at all costs' strategy.
Posted by: DANEgerus at June 20, 2006 09:43 AM
You wrote a line that could easily be fill in the blank:
I don't get it - they vociferously opposed Bush's _______ plan,
Posted by: bullwinkle at June 20, 2006 04:28 PM
My first thought was "after all we've been through, to just let those bastards off the hook?". And then I thought, well if it was good enough for President Lincoln and General Grant........
Posted by: cryinginthewilderness at June 24, 2006 06:30 PM