Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Wednesday Caption Contest: Part 59. | WILLisms.com | Yeah, What He Said » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 345 -- Death Tax Rates Too High In America.Double Taxation, Without Representation- So, the death tax cloture vote was 57-41 last week. Irritating. It needed 60 and only got 57. My sources tell me that Chafee, Pryor, and Landrieu had all apparently pledged to be among the 60, within 24 hours of the vote. All three lied. We need to abolish the death tax. Permanently. Here's why (.pdf): ![]() International tax competition is a good thing. The results are clear. Those with lower taxes win. They win jobs. They win investment. They win GDP growth. America needs to win the low tax competition. The death tax is holding us back. Previous Trivia Tidbit: Europe Needs Major Change. Posted by Will Franklin · 14 June 2006 04:30 PM CommentsBut the Democrats will fix this problem; they've been working on it for decades. Okay, not necessarily the part about "Double Taxation"... I was thinking about all of the dead voters for Democratic Candidates showing that they really CAN have "Representation". Posted by: Mr Michael at June 14, 2006 11:53 PM It seems to me that the right result is to kill the estate tax, but provide (i) that the estate establish and file a written cost basis (as of time of actual purchase, not death) by appraisal or other reasonable means for every material asset in the estate, and failure to do so would result in a basis of $0, and (ii) that the step-up in basis be eliminated. Then, if people sell assets they have inherited they would pay tax on the long-term capital gain, and there would be documents to support the audit. So if the IRS audits me it would be entitled to ask "where is Uncle Bob's complete set of proof Double Eagles, which had a verified basis of $300,000?" If I can't produce the Double Eagles, I would owe tax on the gain above the documented basis. Even if the documented basis were $0, the tax would be straightforward and not unreasonable (since the heir didn't pay anything to get the asset in the first place). This system would eliminate the perverse incentives in the estate tax and perhaps even increase total revenue, since it would apply to all estates, not just the big ones. Posted by: TigerHawk at June 16, 2006 09:45 AM |