Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 358 -- Religion & Civic Engagement. | WILLisms.com | Quotational Therapy: Part 107 -- Democrats & Their Racist Double Standards. » Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Sixty-Three -- Lost Time, Growing Shortfall.![]() Thursdays are good days for reform, because they fall between Wednesdays and Fridays. And reform is a long-haul process, not a fleeting event. So we're going to keep plugging along with the case for reform, even as the issue goes off the political radar screen. That's why WILLisms.com offers a chart or graph, every Thursday, pertinent to Social Security reform. This week's topic: $600 Billion Additional Shortfall. Over the next 75 years, the shortfall in Social Security will be 4.6 trillion dollars, up 600 billion dollars from last year. All this, according to the 2006 Trustees Report. Just to visualize the shortfall in graph form, witness the following, adapted from the most recent Social Security Trustees Report (.pdf): ![]() All of these figures are current dollar figures. What this proves is that we desperately need to fix Social Security, before we waste any more time letting the problem fester. Social Security currently consumes 4.3% of America's GDP; in 2030, it will consume 6.2%. That's substantial, and this proves that failing to reform Social Security until the "last minute" is not an option without negative externalities. Secondly, we can-- at present-- fix Social Security without terrible economic pain; indeed, protected personal Social Security accounts in a modernized system would provide returns far greater than workers receive today, all while making the system self-sustaining and solvent. It's time for reform.
Previous Reform Thursday graphics can be seen here: -Week One (Costs Exceed Revenues). Posted by Will Franklin · 19 October 2006 06:58 PM CommentsWill, many thanks for your continued work dramatizing the worsening size of the Social Security shortfall. The most interesting development of the last week may be that 130 candidates for Congress have signed the For Our Grandchildren pledge to fix Social Security. http://forourgrandchildren.typepad.com/blog/2006/10/what_a_week.html The FOG blog notes that the vast majority of those who have signed the pledge are challengers rather than incumbents. Equally noteworthy are that the signers come from both sides of the aisle. This is powerfully suggestive that the entrenched opposition to Soc Sec reform in Washington is based more on politics than on principles. For reasons you and others have cited, serious analyses all recognize that this problem isn't going away, and legislative action will be needed to correct it. Another noteworthy quote this week comes from no other place than AARP. http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/nation/15662321.htm. An AARP spokesperson admitted that, despite claims to the contrary, no one in Washington is seriously talking about "complete privatization," the term used by reform opponents to incite opposition even to modest Social Security accounts within the federally-administered Social Security structure. Previously, Sebastian Mallaby of the Washington Post had noted that "privatization" was an inccurate scare term as well, when applied to reform proposals: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/10/01/AR2006100100872.html All in all, an interesting week; more and more voices being heard in recognition of the need to fix the system. Posted by: Feverishb at October 20, 2006 06:33 AM Hmmm? Does that mean they are going to bury Soc. Sec.? Posted by: zsa zsa at October 23, 2006 06:13 AM |