The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM
Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM
Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM
Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM
Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM
Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM
Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM
The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM
From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM
Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM
Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM
Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM
Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM
Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM
Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008
Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008
The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006
Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008
Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007
Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006
A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006
Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori
WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):
The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 355 -- Best & Worst States For Taxes.
If there's one thing you should take from reading this blog, it's that ideas matter. In domestic public policy, the fundamental difference between Democrats and Republicans is found on the issue of taxes. Democrats almost unanimously want higher taxes. Republicans, by and large, want lower taxes. These are idea differences that manifest themselves in public policy, and these manifestations can then be observed at the state-by-state level.
Indeed, state tax policy is not arbitrary, and it's not created equal.
The ten best states in the Tax Foundation’s 2007 State Business Tax Climate Index are as follows:
The ten worst states in the Tax Foundation’s 2007 State Business Tax Climate Index are:
The red/blue dichotomy (based on 2004 Bush/Kerry) is pretty clear, without a lot of explanation. To quibble with the color system, New Hampshire and Iowa are more purple than anything (NH went for Bush in 2000; Iowa went for Gore in 2000), while Nebraska's legislature is non-partisan and unicameral. One could probably examine state legislatures and governorships to create a better red/blue/purple dynamic, but that's for another post.
Ultimately, though, it's the ideas and policies-- and the differences between and among the states-- that matter.
These differences have produced very real outcomes:
...between 2000 and 2005, income in the top 10 states in the 2007 Index grew 44 percent faster than in the bottom 10 states. Employment in the top 10 states grew 115 percent faster, output 52 percent faster and population 164 percent faster.
Think about that. States with lower taxes performed better than states with higher taxes. People and businesses wanted to move to low tax states from high tax states. More jobs-- and more higher paying ones-- were created in the low tax states than in the high tax states. How "duh" is all of that?
What we're seeing here is fifty economic laboratories competing against one another. Policies, not surprisingly for those of us who favor good policies, make a difference in economic outcomes.
Good polices = good outcomes. Poor policies = poor outcomes.
Tax competition is good. Low taxes are the way to "win" that competition. Why more states-- especially struggling ones-- don't already grasp this, given the growing profusion of empirical evidence, is increasingly mindboggling.
Previous Trivia Tidbit: School Choice Is Worth A Try.
Posted by Will Franklin · 16 October 2006 03:53 PM
Why more states-- especially struggling ones-- don't already grasp this, given the growing profusion of empirical evidence, is increasingly mindboggling.
Tell me about it. I live in Ohio, and we're all prepared to elect a Democratic governor who will do nothing to make the state more tax-friendly, despite the fact that he pledges to "keep jobs in Ohio." Granted, the Republicans before him were no better, but I'm not sure the solution to Republicans who act like Democrats is to vote in Democrats. But that's what's going to happen. I'm guessing I won't be an Ohioan too much longer.
It all seems so obvious, and yet for some reason, neither party in Ohio gets it. Nor do the people for that matter. Frustrating.
Posted by: Jason at October 17, 2006 08:48 AM