Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Quotational Therapy: Part 107 -- Democrats & Their Racist Double Standards. | WILLisms.com | Will There Be A Nutter Uprising If The Dems Lose? » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 359 -- Bush's Progressive Tax Cuts.Tax Cuts For The Wha...?- Bush tax relief = tax cuts for the rich? Not! Read 'em and weep, socialists: ![]() In 2000, tax returns with an adjusted gross income over $200,000 earned 26.7 percent of all income, and they paid 47.3 percent of all income taxes. That’s a tax-to-income share ratio of 1.79. Four years later in 2004, their share of income had fallen from 26.7 to 25.5 percent, but their share of taxes had risen to 50.0 percent. That brought the ratio up from 1.79 to 1.96 in 2004.
Previous Trivia Tidbit: Libertarians & Social Conservatives Should Get Along. Posted by Will Franklin · 20 October 2006 05:42 PM CommentsHow does the inclusion of social security payroll taxes affect the ratios? Those are supposed to be pretty regressive, maybe that would be a good topic for another reform Thursday (unless you've already covered that, of course. I lose track.). Posted by: John at October 20, 2006 07:38 PM John, It is hard to keep track. BUT thank Goodness for those wonderful WILLisms.com archives! ... Posted by: zsa zsa at October 20, 2006 07:51 PM How does the inclusion of social security payroll taxes affect the ratios? Interesting question. It would also be interesting to see the proportion of folks in various brackets who do collect SS vs. those who do not or not have a need to do so. I wonder if it would have a direct correlation or not. Posted by: snowballs at October 21, 2006 01:57 PM |