Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 404 -- Growing Entitlement Program Costs Make Elections Matter Less. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 405 -- Energy Alternatives. » Social Security Reform Thursday: Week Sixty-Nine -- Taxes On Benefits.![]() Thursdays are good days for reform, because they fall between Wednesdays and Fridays. That's why WILLisms.com offers a chart or graph, every Thursday or so, pertinent to Social Security reform. This week's topic: Taxes On Top Of Taxes. The American Academy of Actuaries has done some analysis on Social Security reform options (.pdf). Their conclusions: We can't permanently fix Social Security by raising taxes and/or cutting benefits alone. Both of those routes are merely temporary patches. Speaking of temporary patches, let's look at one of the more annoying aspects of the program: taxation on top of Social Security benefits. So, the government confiscates your money, keeps it for decades, gives you back a terrible return on your money, then taxes you for the privilege. The American Academy of Actuaries has the data (.pdf): ![]() Because the dollar thresholds are not indexed, 85 percent of most participants’ benefits will ultimately be subject to income tax under current law. The revenue that could be raised through additional benefit taxation is relatively modest. What is the point of this program, anyway? Poverty prevention in old age? Retirement pension supplementation? Social Security is beginning to look more and more like a fatally flawed socialist welfare redistribution regime than any sort of widely popular benefit program worth "protecting." Jay Ambrose opines: To fix this popular program, you have to take some political risks. For decades now the demagogic message largely from Democrats has been that the program is fine as it is and that any adjustments will imperil those currently receiving benefits. Tiptoe toward the truth and you may get severely punished, as President Bush found out when he campaigned for individual retirement accounts and other changes. Ambushed by misinformation, fear-mongering and ideological idiocy, he was forced to retreat while opponents took deep bows. Inaction could mean economic misery, but modernizing Social Security could mean unprecedented economic empowerment. More from Ambrose: Social Security is the place to start because it is easier to address than Medicare, and a way to get the ball rolling. Indeed, some otherwise ideologically-friendly folks (like blogger Professor Bainbridge) opposed Social Security reform mostly because "Medicare is a bigger deal." How utterly daft was that line of thinking? In 2005/2006, we could have changed Social Security in such a way that it would have been a plus for Republicans at the polls, a plus for our economy, and a guideline for future Medicare reform. A handful or two of dupes within the GOP joined the lot of stooges in the minority and were able to block popular and necessary personal accounts, recasting the entire issue in oldschool demogogic terms, a net political liability for Republicans. Missed opportunity. Now the stooges are in charge, and it very well may be years before such a grand opportunity again presents itself. In the meantime, the system remains a pillar of Enron-style Marxist dysfunction, rather than a blueprint for further liberty-based entitlement reform.
Previous Reform Thursday graphics can be seen here: -Week One (Costs Exceed Revenues). Posted by Will Franklin · 25 January 2007 02:13 PM Comments |