Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Jewish Conspiracy Destroyed Gaza Synagogues | WILLisms.com | This Just In: The Taliban Are Still LOSERS » We Might Have To Reconsider The 'No Women In Combat' Rule. . . if they can fight this well. (h/t Dean Esmay). Posted by Ken McCracken · 4 March 2007 09:13 PM CommentsI love the blog that you have. I was wondering if you would link my blog to yours and in return I would do the same for your blog. If you want to, my site name is American Legends and the URL is: www.americanlegends.info If you want to do this just go to my blog and in one of the comments just write your blog name and the URL and I will add it to my site. Thanks, Posted by: David at March 4, 2007 09:21 PM It's good to see her recognized... although the article you link to was writen about 18 months ago! :) There may be reasonable factors that keep women from being assigned combat positions, but competency isn't one of them. Not after they get their training at least! Posted by: Mr. Michael at March 5, 2007 01:48 AM Hey, it took this guy 40 years to get recognition. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Harvey_Carney 18 months is nuthin'. Posted by: Ken McCracken at March 5, 2007 04:08 AM I don't think courage and grace-under-pressure have ever been issues. If they are, they shouldn't be. Physical inability to throw a grenade far enough or carry some weapons - that's a problem. But, as we see from the article, sometimes combat finds you. Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at March 5, 2007 04:43 PM |