Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Hugh Hewitt Interviews RON PAUL!!!1!!11!! | WILLisms.com | Quote Of The Day: Hell Freezing Over Edition » Did Hillary Commit Hsu-icide?
Via Gateway Pundit we find that generous Democratic contributor and 'hillraiser' Norman Hsu may have been a close associate of China missile trader Bernard Schwartz. Oh, this is getting bad for Her Annointed Highness. This is dredging up all the unpleasant things people wanted to forget about Hillary, and puts the Clinton sleaze factor back into play. Norman Hsu may not have committed (another) crime with his byzantine donation practices, but it does go to prove that the Clintons have never fixed their faulty scumbag detectors. The receiving line of sleazoids greeting the Clintons seems to have no end. For what it's worth, this is what WorldNetDaily has to say about this: Last November, Schwartz and Hsu chaired a New School banquet at the Mandarin Oriental in New York which featured Sen. Clinton as keynote speaker. Clinton steered a $1 million federal grant to the college.WND reporting often seems hysterical (not in a funny ha ha way) but they do offer this screen shot: ![]() Is there more than just this? Stay tuned as this story goes drip, drip, drip along. Update: Drip, drip indeed. There are now two more very questionable donors to the Hillary campaign being investigated: Sant S. Chantwal and Tendo Oto. Commenter Frieda reminds us about fugitive contributor Abdul Rehman Jinnah. Why, it is turning into a veritable United Nations of corruption over at Camp Hillary. Question: When is the mainstream media going to step up and fulfill its duty to defend Hillary against these scurrilous rightwing charges? Just when are we going to see the interlocking charts of donors contributing to those making these accusations? When are the criminal backgrounds of these alleged donors going to be debunked and placed in their proper context? We aren't going to let Hillary get swiftboated on this, are we? Just where the hell are Rahm Emmanuel and James Carville??!??!1?? Answer: Are you kidding? As Jay Tea points out, these scandals have not even penetrated the thick forehead cocoon armor plating of the left wing yet. Posted by Ken McCracken · 3 September 2007 04:17 PM CommentsBeautiful... Posted by: zsa zsa at September 3, 2007 05:30 PM You forgot to mention the indicted Pakestani donor, Mr. Rehman Jinnah. Here is the link: http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/30/hillary-loves-fugitive-moneymen/
Posted by: Frieda at September 4, 2007 02:02 AM Thanks Frieda! Posted by: Ken McCacken at September 4, 2007 02:08 AM It will be ignored as long as possible. There will not be any stroking of beards on the Sunday shows or serious editorials asking "Is this a problem for Hillary?" (Oh, I'm sorry. "Is this a problem of perception for Senator Clinton?"). Not unless it gets bigger and then won't go away. Then the swiftboating references will come out. Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at September 4, 2007 08:17 AM Wasn't ignoring it as long as possible exactly what made the Swiftboat thing a problem for Kerry? The narrative here is being written, without Democratic editing. They can only afford to sit this one out for so long. Posted by: Ken McCacken at September 4, 2007 08:20 AM Even better the Hsu-nami! Posted by: DANEgerus at September 4, 2007 09:22 AM Frieda, You have hit upon a good point here. Why has Obama not been going after HRM about this. I have been out of the news cycle for the last two weeks and I have not heard anything about him going after her about this. Could it be that the Hsu strings reach out and touch a lot of other democrats. Sorry, I like corny stuff. Posted by: Eneils Bailey at September 5, 2007 04:29 PM One more thing. Every time, Hillary visits Los Angels, there is a certain Iranian group that does fundraising for her. This group advocates talks with Iranian regime, I won't be surprised if shaky Iranian fundraise is also in her list. I can't not proof anything now, but I do remember a "questionable" Iranian fundraise being part of Kerry campaign. check this: http://209.157.64.200/focus/f-news/1066568/posts BTW/ thanks for the link to be blog. :-) Posted by: Frieda at September 5, 2007 10:49 PM See what I found: Posted by: Frieda at September 5, 2007 10:51 PM |