Buy WILLisms

XML Feed

Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Blogroll Me!



July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004

Social Security Reform Thursday.
March 13, 2008

Caption Contest: Enter Today!
Due: July 29, 2008

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006


Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori

WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy):

The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site


This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif

Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif


« Hugh Hewitt Interviews RON PAUL!!!1!!11!! | WILLisms.com | Quote Of The Day: Hell Freezing Over Edition »

Did Hillary Commit Hsu-icide?

Hillary Clinton with some guy.

Via Gateway Pundit we find that generous Democratic contributor and 'hillraiser' Norman Hsu may have been a close associate of China missile trader Bernard Schwartz. Oh, this is getting bad for Her Annointed Highness. This is dredging up all the unpleasant things people wanted to forget about Hillary, and puts the Clinton sleaze factor back into play. Norman Hsu may not have committed (another) crime with his byzantine donation practices, but it does go to prove that the Clintons have never fixed their faulty scumbag detectors. The receiving line of sleazoids greeting the Clintons seems to have no end.

For what it's worth, this is what WorldNetDaily has to say about this:

Last November, Schwartz and Hsu chaired a New School banquet at the Mandarin Oriental in New York which featured Sen. Clinton as keynote speaker. Clinton steered a $1 million federal grant to the college.

More recently, Schwartz and Hsu (pronounced shoo) appeared together at the New York Yacht Club for Democratic Rep. Patrick Kennedy's 40th birthday bash...

WND reporting often seems hysterical (not in a funny ha ha way) but they do offer this screen shot:


Is there more than just this? Stay tuned as this story goes drip, drip, drip along.

Update: Drip, drip indeed. There are now two more very questionable donors to the Hillary campaign being investigated: Sant S. Chantwal and Tendo Oto. Commenter Frieda reminds us about fugitive contributor Abdul Rehman Jinnah. Why, it is turning into a veritable United Nations of corruption over at Camp Hillary.

Question: When is the mainstream media going to step up and fulfill its duty to defend Hillary against these scurrilous rightwing charges? Just when are we going to see the interlocking charts of donors contributing to those making these accusations? When are the criminal backgrounds of these alleged donors going to be debunked and placed in their proper context? We aren't going to let Hillary get swiftboated on this, are we?

Just where the hell are Rahm Emmanuel and James Carville??!??!1??

Answer: Are you kidding? As Jay Tea points out, these scandals have not even penetrated the thick forehead cocoon armor plating of the left wing yet.

Posted by Ken McCracken · 3 September 2007 04:17 PM



Posted by: zsa zsa at September 3, 2007 05:30 PM

You forgot to mention the indicted Pakestani donor, Mr. Rehman Jinnah.

Here is the link: http://michellemalkin.com/2007/08/30/hillary-loves-fugitive-moneymen/

Oh! Obama is smiling wide..

Posted by: Frieda at September 4, 2007 02:02 AM

Thanks Frieda!

Posted by: Ken McCacken at September 4, 2007 02:08 AM

It will be ignored as long as possible. There will not be any stroking of beards on the Sunday shows or serious editorials asking "Is this a problem for Hillary?" (Oh, I'm sorry. "Is this a problem of perception for Senator Clinton?"). Not unless it gets bigger and then won't go away. Then the swiftboating references will come out.

Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at September 4, 2007 08:17 AM

Wasn't ignoring it as long as possible exactly what made the Swiftboat thing a problem for Kerry?

The narrative here is being written, without Democratic editing.

They can only afford to sit this one out for so long.

Posted by: Ken McCacken at September 4, 2007 08:20 AM

Even better the Hsu-nami!

Posted by: DANEgerus at September 4, 2007 09:22 AM


You have hit upon a good point here. Why has Obama not been going after HRM about this. I have been out of the news cycle for the last two weeks and I have not heard anything about him going after her about this.

Could it be that the Hsu strings reach out and touch a lot of other democrats.
Are we yet to hear the other Hsu hit the floor?

Sorry, I like corny stuff.

Posted by: Eneils Bailey at September 5, 2007 04:29 PM

One more thing. Every time, Hillary visits Los Angels, there is a certain Iranian group that does fundraising for her. This group advocates talks with Iranian regime, I won't be surprised if shaky Iranian fundraise is also in her list. I can't not proof anything now, but I do remember a "questionable" Iranian fundraise being part of Kerry campaign. check this:

BTW/ thanks for the link to be blog. :-)

Posted by: Frieda at September 5, 2007 10:49 PM

See what I found:
According to the Center for Responsive Politics, Clinton has received $5000 in campaign contributions from a PAC called the American Iranian Council, which is known to be against sanctions and in favor of restoring diplomatic and trade relations between America and Iran — something that would only further prop up the regime.

Posted by: Frieda at September 5, 2007 10:51 PM