Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Erwin Chemerinsky: You Win Some, You Lose Some | WILLisms.com | Quote Of The Day » The Battle of Antietam![]() Today marks the anniversary of the Battle of Antietam, which is still the single-day highest death toll for Americans; higher than D-Day or September 11, 2001. The battle was a tactical draw, but a Union victory that forced the Confederate forces off Northern soil. It marked the Union 'victory' President Lincoln was looking for to issue the Emancipation Proclamation. Update: Rob Port added this to my crosspost over at Say Anything: Battle of Antietam: 2,108 killed in one day (on just the Union side, 1,546 Confederates died as well). War in Iraq: 3,782 killed...in four and a half years. Point? By any historical measure, Iraq has been one of the least costly protracted military engagements in our nation's history in terms of lives lost. If this war truly is as "unsustainable" as some would have us believe we are in a lot bigger trouble than anything the middle east portends. Posted by Ken McCracken · 17 September 2007 04:59 PM CommentsThat is sad.... Posted by: zsa zsa at September 17, 2007 05:18 PM One can play any games they want using numbers of dead. Less than 3000 were killed in the 9/11 attacks. If the 3700 dead in Iraq are no big deal then, by that logic, neither was 9/11. It should have been out of the news after a week, and long forgotten by now. Posted by: ChrisRocket at September 18, 2007 12:09 PM truly a dark day. thousands killed at the hands of the despot King Lincoln. Slavery was ended peacefully every where else on earth.
Posted by: lester at September 18, 2007 04:49 PM 'despot King Lincoln'?? Are you joking lester, or have you lost your frickin' mind? Posted by: Ken McCacken at September 18, 2007 08:31 PM worst president in our history. hands down Posted by: lester at September 19, 2007 08:29 AM Ah, so you have lost your frickin' mind then. Posted by: Ken McCacken at September 19, 2007 11:32 AM http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig2/lincoln-arch.html Posted by: lester at September 19, 2007 03:01 PM |