Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« And Now A Shia Awakening, Too? | WILLisms.com | Erwin Chemerinsky: You Win Some, You Lose Some » The Left Calls The Tune: Now Dance, DemocratsElizabeth Edwards' denouncement of the 'Betray Us' ad provide a window into the sick, sick soul of the left - causing at least one of them, Jane Hamsher, to reveal the madness behind the method: First of all I dont care if John Kerry was eating live babies on TV, one week out from an election you do not repeat GOP talking points. Ever. In regard to being asked about the Betray Us ad, Hamsher counsels Democrats as follows:
So . . . being a whacko leftwing blogger is all a ruse to make Democratic candidates 'look moderate?' Heh, not actually be moderate, but just look it? And if a GOP 'talking point' is something like 'eating live babies is bad . . . ' every Democrat is supposed to disagree with it regardless of how silly it makes that Democrat look? Just because Jane Hamsher says so? Hamsher would have Edwards stifle herself when honorable men and women in uniform are attacked, because apparently, the most evil thing one can do is agree with Republicans. Even when someone like Edwards knows, as a matter of deeply-held principles, that it is the right thing to do. Posted by Ken McCracken · 15 September 2007 08:53 PM CommentsWho is Jane Hamsher? Posted by: zsa zsa at September 15, 2007 09:47 PM You don't wanna know. Posted by: Ken McCacken at September 15, 2007 10:24 PM petreaus can't hide behind his uniform. he is a de facto beaurocrat in this situation. If people are giving their opinions on policy they are subject to scrutiny. isn't that what Ann Coulter taught us when she was skewering 9/11 widows apropos of nothing? Posted by: lester at September 16, 2007 08:03 AM Hi, 'Some' good things going on in Iraq right now: Photo Essay (35 Pictures) out of Iraq, taken this month (Sept 2007) Have a great weekend! Posted by: Steve Johnson at September 16, 2007 04:54 PM lester, you are calling accusations of treason "scrutiny." I don't recall you being on record for that flowing in the other direction. Conservative suspicions confirmed, once again. It gets tiring, y'know? Posted by: Assistant Village Idiot at September 17, 2007 08:02 AM MOVEON.ORG needs to move on! What a bunch of whacko's. At least Elizabeth Edwards, Ed Koch, and Lieberman showed their allegience. Not many of those remain in the Dem party... Posted by: zsa zsa at September 17, 2007 11:26 AM he did betray us. Posted by: lester at September 18, 2007 04:55 PM |