Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 494 - Unsustainable Liberal Policies. | WILLisms.com | Wednesday Caption Contest: Part 147. » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 495 - Media Bias.Even With Rev. Wright Included, Obama Still Media Darling- Yesterday, I was on the road listening to XM's POTUS '08 channel, and the Washington Post's "Post Politics" podcast came on. One of the topics was a hit piece on John McCain, for being too close to-- of all groups-- Citizens Against Government Waste. Apparently, because Citizens Against Government Waste, one of the premier government spending watchdog groups in the country, has some admiration for and peripheral associations with John McCain, there is some sort of impropriety. This is Citizens Against Government Waste we're talking about, here. They're not working for any special favors or earmarks or pork or subsidies. They are working to clean up the system. To cut spending. To end pork. And, yet, the podcast made the McCain/CAGW relationship sound like some sort of sinister big-money conspiracy to thwart and violate campaign laws in some evil web of corruption. The Post reporter rhetorically asked why they care about Citizens Against Government Waste, then answered himself (.mp3): "We care, because it turns out that they have a very close relationship, in some respects, to Senator McCain." A close relationship!? The horror. Then comes the supporting evidence: -McCain shared a cell in Vietnam with a CAGW Board Member. Then, to bring it further back to the realm of sinister, the reporter declares: "They accept money from people whose message they are promoting." They were too busy fawning over Barack Obama to even go into the details, but they did direct the listener to their story on the subject. In the article, there are totally unsubstantiated and irrelevant references to Jack Abramoff and a scary-sounding Senate investigation. Pretty weak attack, really. Although the article and podcast are framed in an incredibly negative light, it actually reinforces my notion that: John McCain is credible on spending. For many people, unfortunately, it's just a hit piece, and it'll probably be filed away in the brain somewhere for later. It's just something that will make them think twice about supporting the Republican. The story is clearly part of a media narrative designed to plant a seed of doubt about John McCain's integrity. Interestingly, the left-leaning Project for Excellence in Journalism examined media coverage of Obama, Clinton, and McCain, and found that, unsurprisingly, Obama was the media darling, followed closely by Mrs. Clinton, with Senator McCain far behind: ![]() These numbers include all of the "bitter" and "clinging to guns and religion" hubbub, plus the Jeremiah Wright kerfuffle. And Obama's STILL getting the most positive press of any candidate. Even with Obama quitting his church, there's very little way this will not be very relevant in the general election. I tend to believe that there are plenty more gaffes to come, from Michelle Obama, from Obama's associates, and maybe even from Obama himself. The media has covered for this guy's insane buddies and mentors, his out-of-the-mainstream left-wing record, and his politics-as-usual approach, really since his speech at the Democratic National Convention in 2004. They'll probably keep covering for him until November and beyond. That's why-- as Republicans-- we've got to work even harder to get our message out. The collective establishment media, in this generation, will never be fair to Republicans. We've got to, therefore, continue to nurture our own media and speak directly to America about the conservative ideas they naturally tend to support.
Previous Trivia Tidbit: People Flee Liberal Policies. Posted by Will Franklin · 3 June 2008 12:52 PM CommentsThat's why-- as Republicans-- we've got to work even harder to get our message out. The collective establishment media, in this generation, will never be fair to Republicans.Do you think future generations of journalists will be more balanced? IMO, that may be wishful thinking. Posted by: Hoodlumman at June 3, 2008 02:06 PM Yeah, I am fairly optimistic that media will change enough that it won't be dominated by any big establishment forces. It will take a generation or two, and there will still be plenty of liberal media, they just won't be the referees any longer. They'll just be another voice in the media cacophony. Posted by: Will Franklin at June 3, 2008 02:18 PM |