Buy WILLisms XML Feed Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 March 13, 2008 Due: July 29, 2008 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com June 2008 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 503 - Rhode Island, Texas' Antithesis. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 505 - New Hampshire & Jobs. » Trivia Tidbit Of The Day: Part 504 - Unionism & Jobs.Unions Drive Jobs Away- In the past year, America's economy is a tale of two types of states. The lower tax states, which also tend to be right-to-work states and therefore have low proportions of unionized workers as a percentage of the total workforce, have ranged somewhere between decent, pretty well, and booming. The higher tax states, however, which tend to be forced-unionization states with high proportions of union workers, have seen a range of economic performance somewhere between OMG and WTF. Let's examine the top 10 states for private-sector job creation (rate, not raw #) over the past year, versus the top 10 states for private-sector job loss (.pdf): ![]() The top ten states for job creation, from June 2007 to June 2008, added 332,100 jobs. The bottom ten states lost 330,400 jobs. Pretty much identical. Interestingly, in those top ten states, the median percentage of workers who are unionized is 8.9%. In the bottom ten states, it's 14.2%. A fairly substantial difference. Maybe unions should change their bumper sticker from "the ones who brought you the weekend" to "the ones who brought you the weakened economy in your state."
Previous Trivia Tidbit: Rhode Island Is The Opposite Of Texas. Posted by Will Franklin · 22 July 2008 08:11 AM CommentsI'd like to know why it takes coercive tactics on the behalf of unionbusters to get those numbers. That is, stuffing the ballot by hiring people that will dilute the pool of voters, obstructing unions when they wish to make their case to people, intimidating workers with thugs from Vance International, running gambling pools to gauge their success(none of which are secret), Card check puts the control in the worker. Nothing Soviet about it unless you wish to dirty your own hands with the same blood. Posted by: sethstorm at July 25, 2008 04:17 PM
Posted by: sethstorm at July 25, 2008 04:18 PM |