Buy WILLisms XML Feed WILLisms.com on Twitter Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM June 20, 2005 5:36 AM Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM May 12, 2006 6:15 PM Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM July 25, 2007 4:32 PM May 28, 2008 11:12 PM June 9, 2008 12:25 PM Blogroll Me! April 2009 March 2009 February 2009 January 2009 November 2008 October 2008 September 2008 August 2008 July 2008 June 2008 May 2008 April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 October 2005 September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 January 29, 2008 Jan. 21, 2009 Mar. 14, 2006 Apr. 4, 2008 May 19, 2007 July 9, 2006 July 14, 2006 Powered by Movable Type 3.17 Site Design by Sekimori WILLisms.com January 2009 Book of the Month (certified classy): The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
|
« Follow WILLisms.com on Twitter... | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 523 -- Mandatory Spending Outpaces Discretionary, BIGTIME. » Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 522 -- Conservative Stimulus Alternatives.We Can't Simply Be Against Bailouts, We Must Have Our Own Good Ideas As Well- Recent history provides an important lesson for politicians on how to stimulate the economy. In 2004, America tried out a very short-term experiment. We drastically lowered the corporate tax on repatriated profits (money made overseas and brought back to the United States for reinvestment or shareholder disbursement) from 35% to 5.25%. Because conservative Republicans were only marginally in charge of government at the time, the change was VERY temporary. We've discussed the results of this temporary change before, in a post in November of 2006. Essentially, it encouraged hundreds of billions of dollars to flow back into the United States. And it went toward good and productive purposes: In order to motivate businesses to bring this money back to the U.S., the new administration and Congress should consider legislation similar to a bipartisan 2004 law, The American Jobs Creation Act. This law incentivized U.S. businesses to bring $360 billion of foreign subsidiary earnings back into the U.S. at a reduced corporate tax rate of 5.25% for one year. A survey of several hundred of these companies found that they used, on average, 25% of those funds for U.S. capital investment, 23% for hiring and training of U.S. employees, 14% for U.S.-based R&D, and 13% for U.S. debt reduction. But then it went away. Instead of spending trillions on top of trillions on permanent expansions of government, why not try this out. It will inject hundreds of billions of dollars into the U.S. economy over the next few years: ![]() Temporarily reinstating the dividends-received-deduction for repatriated foreign subsidiary earnings leads to significantly higher corporate cash flow, increased capital expenditures including R&D, improved business financial conditions, more jobs at nonfinancial corporations and at financial institutions, and a significant increase in real economic activity. So, this is one alternative. We Republicans have lots of alternatives. Frankly, doing nothing would probably be better than kicking this crisis' can down the road a bit. If we have to "DO SOMETHING!!!!!", we should explore ways to jump-start our economy through pro-growth policies.
Previous Trivia Tidbit: Texas Created Jobs In 2008. Posted by Will Franklin · 28 January 2009 02:37 PM Comments |