Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed
WILLisms.com on Twitter

Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links

Blogroll Me!







Search



Archives

March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
January 29, 2008

Caption Contest
Jan. 21, 2009

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com January 2009 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 530 -- The Worst Economy Since The Great Depression? | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 532 -- Bailout 2009 Visual Depiction. »

Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 531 -- Bailout Recipients Continue Political Contributions.

Kickbacks For Voting "Correctly"-

Bailouts are a good political fundraising tool, apparently:

Lawmakers said the federal bailout program, which was passed Oct. 3, would help banks keep credit moving in the market to help Americans buy homes and cars.

But within weeks, money also was moving into their campaign accounts.

JPMorgan's employee PAC, for instance, has issued $275,552 in political donations since Oct. 16, including $91,000 spent three weeks after the bailout was approved.

Wells Fargo & Co.'s employee PAC has approved $211,400 in political donations. Bank of America's PAC issued another $304,265.

It should be stressed that these political donations are from the PACs of these companies-- the money comes voluntarily from individuals who work at these companies. Donations given and taken in a vacuum by themselves are not evidence of anything nefarious. HOWEVER, this is a great example of how a more expansive government necessarily leads to corruption at the worst and the appearance of conflicts of interest at best.

When government grows, individuals and organizations are compelled to contribute more in order to gain access to lawmakers and protect their interests from uninformed whims and populist showboating. When government is playing an active role in confiscating, regulating, and redistributing wealth, a rent-seeking bailout mentality necessarily takes hold. Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. When government is small and limited, it's in the background-- an afterthought. Limited government limits the opportunities for corruption and curtails the need to lobby.

And speaking of lobbying, didn't Democrats win in 2006 primarily on the "culture of corruption" issue?

Under Democrat control, we now have an explosion in the lobbying industry in Washington, DC:

lobbyistslongtermcontributions.gif

We also have a litany of anecdotal stories of Democrat corruption that is far more broad and deep than anything people revolted against in 2006.

Democrats right now are drunk with power. They are reckless. If we can just eject brand-tainting elected officials (Senators Collins, Snowe, and Specter, for example) from the party, Republicans have a very real opportunity to regain power very soon.

Unfortunately, the massive expansion of government we're currently witnessing is likely creating new handout/bailout addicts as we speak. The growth of dependency culture in America may very well lead to a lengthy generation of Democrat electoral dominance. Policies have consequences. Nearly every single policy coming out of Congress right now is designed not to grow the economy but to grow the Democratic Party.

-------------------------------------

Previous Trivia Tidbit: Bad Economy? Yes. Worst ever? No..

Posted by Will Franklin · 11 February 2009 10:36 AM

Comments