Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed
WILLisms.com on Twitter

WILLisms.com via email:

Delivered by FeedBurner



Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links

Blogroll Me!







Search



Archives

July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
January 29, 2008

Caption Contest Archive
Jan. 21, 2009

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com January 2009 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 547 -- The University of Texas' Top 10% Rule. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 549 -- Taxes Too High. »

Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 548 -- Earmarks.

Pork Doesn't Measure Up To Entitlement Spending, But It Drives Overall Spending Upward & Corrupts Congress-

Chuck Schumer infamously derided (via YouTube) "the chattering classes" for focusing so much of their attention on the "little porky amendments" in the stimulus package.

In some ways, he had a point. The "pork" or "earmarks" made up only a small percentage of the overall disaster of a bill. But to paraphrase Yogi Berra, when you take a billion here and a billion there, eventually you're talking about real money. And pork is bad for more than the sheer dollars figures involved. It does at least two really, really bad things:

1. It contributes to a culture of overall spending growth. There is a strong correlative link between pork growth and growth in non-pork programs.

2. It corrupts. It causes legislators to trade their votes to get their home project funded. It proliferates lobbyists' hands in bills. Pork eliminates competition and transparency. It's bad for a lot of reasons, even though entitlements are the real driver of government spending.

Just take a gander at government spending growth in 2009, which includes more than 9,000 earmarks:

up80percentin2009.gif

The American people hired Obama to put out a fire. He showed up and sprayed a tank full of jet fuel all over it. It's no wonder that the stock market has completely tanked over the past month or two and the unemployment rate has jumped up to 8.1% (.pdf). Just for reference, Texas' rate is also climbing but remains 1.7% lower-- at 6.4%.

Interesting, too, that Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchison wants to replace fiscally conservative Rick Perry as Governor, yet she is the 22nd biggest porker in the Senate, and she's the biggest porker in Texas:

WASHINGTON – Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison fought against earmarks this week, urging her colleagues to trim wasteful spending from a $410 billion bill and even voting to strip all 8,500 earmarks from the measure.

Yet Hutchison also was the state's biggest sponsor of earmarks – more than $150 million for Texas.

Actually, the Senator was responsible for 113 earmarks totaling $267,153,966. A little higher than the 150 million figure in the Dallas Morning News.

She also said:

I do think that earmarks are a legitimate role of Congress.

How is that fiscally conservative? How does she think she can win conservative Republican primary voters with that mentality, especially looking at the latest Rasmussen numbers showing Governor Perry's rising approval ratings?

-------------------------------------

Previous Trivia Tidbit: Top 10% Rule.

Posted by Will Franklin · 6 March 2009 11:53 AM

Comments

Just say NO to pork! That means no thanks, Kay!

Posted by: ZsaZsa at March 6, 2009 12:30 PM

All Porkers need to be on NOTICE that we refuse to accept supporting Pork. I think Kay is really cute. BUT not if she is running for Pork Queen!

Posted by: ZsaZsa at March 6, 2009 01:30 PM

Um... Will, that "billion here" quote is from Senator Everett Dirksen, I believe.

J.

Posted by: Jay Tea at March 7, 2009 08:08 AM