WILLisms.com on Twitter
The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM
Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM
Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM
Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM
Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM
Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM
Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM
The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM
From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM
Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM
Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM
Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM
Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM
Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM
Social Security Reform Thursday.
January 29, 2008
Jan. 21, 2009
The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006
Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008
Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007
Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006
A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006
Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori
WILLisms.com January 2009 Book of the Month (certified classy):
The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 562 -- Medicare.
Our Entitlements Are Out Of Control-
Watching a TiVo'd Frontline last night about our national debt, Forrest Sawyer seemed to place most of the blame on the Bush administration. The gist: Bush cut taxes, which starved the government of money, all while fighting a big war and signing the Medicare Prescription Drug benefit.
There is some truth to that criticism, but not much.
Tax relief did not starve the beast, as many hoped/feared. Tax collections were hitting record highs until we entered this housing bubble-caused recession. Revenue was abundantly flowing into the federal government. Revenue was not the problem.
Nor was military spending, or even the Medicare Prescription Drug plan. The cost of Afghanistan and Iraq have been staggering, but a) they are not permanent annual costs and b) our defense spending as a percentage of GDP is still historically low. While adding prescription drugs to Medicare will have a major negative impact on our fiscal picture over the long run, it has had very little impact on our deficits today. Drugs for seniors are such a minor drop in the bucket to this point.
So what's the deal?
Well, revenues were way up until the recession hit. Military spending was certainly up, but not by enough to account for our current deficit. Same with prescription drugs in Medicare. So why do we have these huge deficits? Surely, it's pork, right?
Nope. Not even pork. Pork is also a drop in the bucket, relative to the absurdly large spending leviathan we have created in Washington.
No, the biggest spending increases during the Bush administration were auto-pilot increases in Social Security, Medicare at-large, and Medicaid. Social Security is the largest individual spending program that Washington has right now. Bigger than war. And according to Chuck Blahous, the so-called surpluses are drying up a lot sooner than anyone imagined (watch starting at the 2:30 mark, through about the 7:00 mark).
But what about Medicare? Right now, Medicare is not the biggest problem. Social Security is much bigger. But over the long-term, Medicare as a whole (prescription drugs being a small part of that whole) dwarfs pretty much everything:
It has not always been this way. In 1985, Medicare drew only 0.4 percent of GDP ($17.9 billion) from the general fund to cover its excess costs. Ten years later, this had increased slightly to 0.5 percent of GDP ($37.0 billion). By 2007, Medicare's draw had more than doubled to 1.3 percent of GDP ($179 billion).
And it's only going to get worse... MUCH, MUCH worse.
Previous Trivia Tidbit: Schools.
Posted by Will Franklin · 26 March 2009 12:43 PM
Will, I found this quote to be very telling of our times today...
“By the frame of the government under which we live, this same people have wisely given their public servants but little power for mischief; and have, with equal wisdom, provided for the return of that little to their own hands at very short intervals. While the people retain their virtue and vigilance, no administration, by any extreme of wickedness or folly, can very seriously injure the government in the short space of four years.”
(1) We have given the government designed to have “little power for mischief” with nearly unlimited power for mischief.
Posted by: Scott Larrison at March 26, 2009 01:39 PM
Congress and Washington is out of control. They are like rabid dogs foaming at the mouth. It is really sick!
Posted by: ZsaZsa at March 26, 2009 04:51 PM