Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed
WILLisms.com on Twitter


Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links









Search



Archives

December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
January 29, 2008

Caption Contest Archive
Jan. 21, 2009

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com January 2009 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 594 -- Texas' Unemployment Insurance Tax Rate. | WILLisms.com | Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 596 -- American Corporate Taxes Way Too High. »

Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 595 -- Earmarks Undermined Trust, Ruined Republican Brand.

Pork Was The Problem, Politically-

The Republican Party is looking for answers right now. In 2006, Democrats just really stuck it to Republicans in Congressional elections. In 2008, Obama really just walloped us again. These things are cyclical. The President's party usually loses seats in midterm elections, as a rule, so 2006 was nothing too out of the ordinary. In 2008, Obama won places like North Carolina and Indiana. That is just unacceptable.

The Republican brand was tarnished by a lot of things, including Mark Foley's non-sex sex scandal (which dominated media coverage in the final month of the 2006 cycle) and the idea that the GOP was a corrupt party in bed with lobbyists and special interests. I think fatigue over the Iraq war probably played a role, as well, but when I am at events with a lot of Republicans, listening to what they care about, almost uniformly they express that they are angry their Republican Party spent like drunken sailors and let budget deficits get out of control. They hate the spending. They hate the pork barrel projects.

Pork, while only a relatively small piece of an enormous spending problem, is the symbolic embodiment of wasteful spending. When people think of out-of-control deficits, they don't conceptualize that Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid are the big three auto-pilot programs inflating the budget deficit the very most. They think of bridges to nowhere and other pork projects:

earmarksgop.gif

Pork is back up under Democrats, and lots of unprincipled RINOs are joining them at the slop trough.

Republicans won't take back Congress until our Party stands for something. We can't be lite-Democrats. That doesn't mean that we can't reach out to moderates, but we can't pander to moderates so much that we dilute what we stand for.

Oink.

-------------------------------------

Previous Trivia Tidbit: Kudos To Rick Perry On UI Rejection.

Posted by Will Franklin · 20 May 2009 04:22 PM

Comments

Plus pork projects too often look like corruption or payoff to donors. The reaction of most locals is WHAT? (or WTF?) These projects are often ones that can not get approval by local government.

Posted by: JGsez at May 20, 2009 06:35 PM

"but we can't pander to moderates so much that we dilute what we stand for."

By pandering to the moderates, I take it you mean listening to the voters? The US is a centrist nation, whether or not you like it. It does best when it has a center-leaning Democratic administration or a center-leaning Republican administration. Note that 2000-2008 was a right-wing administration, and it hurt.

Don't pander to anyone... listen to the American people. That is what the elected leaders are supposed to do in a democracy. George W Bush never understood that, and barely masked his contempt for democracy. He took the nation on a course the American people did not want. His incredible earmarks, not to mention his incredible deficit spending spree, were about him solidifying his power among his congress, not about helping the US.

Yes, both parties are tax-and-spend. Both parties use earmarks in order to get their bills pushed through. Earmarks dramatically rose in 2008, let's be clear. The pork is bipartisan.

Earmarks won't go away until we dismantle the industrial-military-congressional complex. That's the biggest trough.

Posted by: neil at May 21, 2009 09:32 AM

There you go again. Neither George W. Bush, or any other President, has ever created an earmark. Nor do Presidents balance budgets or create deficits. The President proposes and Congress disposes. The President of the US can not spend one cent. US fiscal health, or ill-health, is the sole responsibility of the US Congress. Unfortunately, the President gets the blame or credit. All a President can do is veto a bill which is why Congress puts earmarks into essential spending legislation.

Bush certainly should have done more to reign in the earmark spending of his party however. The same holds true for Obama.

Posted by: JGsez at May 21, 2009 12:21 PM