Willisms
Navigation

Buy WILLisms

XML Feed
rss-icon.gif Feedburner RSS
WILLisms.com on Twitter




Featured Entries

The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM

Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM

Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM

Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM

Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM

Idea Majorities Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM

Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM

The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM

From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM

Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM

Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM

Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM

Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM

Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM



Donate





Links









Search



Archives

August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004




Social Security Reform Thursday.
January 29, 2008

Caption Contest Archive
Jan. 21, 2009

The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006

Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008

Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007

Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006

A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006




Credits

Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori




WILLisms.com January 2009 Book of the Month (certified classy):











The WILLisms.com Gift Shop: Support This Site

giftshopbanner.gif











This Week's Carnival of Revolutions: carnivalbutton.gif



Carnival Home Base: homebase.gif

























Willisms

« Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 803 -- Republican Wave Election In 2010? | WILLisms.com | Honor Memorial Day. »

Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 804 -- Leave Texas Alone.

EPA Takes Over Texas Refineries-

The Obama administration is not letting this oil seep crisis go to waste, and they are using it to implement all kinds of anti-drilling measures. They're also seizing permitting control of dozens of Texas refineries and other facilities.

Texas is doing just fine reducing emissions and promoting alternative energy sources, without these kinds of draconian (and counterproductive) federal takeovers.

From 2004-2007, for example, Texas reduced carbon dioxide emissions by double-digits (10.9%), which was good enough for second best in the country. Only 17 states reduced emissions at all during this period:

texassecondbestimprovement.gif

By the way, this data is from a liberal environmentalist group called Environment Texas, so save the "paid for by Exxon Mobil" schtick.

Texas is also making improvements on other types of emissions.

Texas produces a fifth of the nation's crude oil, a fourth of the nation's fuel supply, a fourth of the nation's natural gas, roughly 60% of the nation's chemicals. Since 2000, the population in Texas has grown by nearly 3.5 million people.

Yet, over the same frame of time, statewide ozone levels have fallen 22% and nitrogen oxide levels have fallen 46%:

texasozoneandnox.gif

Per capita carbon dioxide emissions in Texas are down 17% from 1990-2007 and 8% from 2004-2007. Texas went from 9th per capita to 14th per capita from 1990 to 2007. Specifically, industrial emissions (which are what the Obama administration is allegedly concerned about, here) are down 25% in Texas from 2004-2007.

Of the 10 metropolitan statistical areas with the highest ozone values for 2006-2008, none are in Texas, despite the number of large and growing cities in our state. Not a single county in Texas is in non-attainment for fine particulate matter, and there really is no real crisis that would warrant Washington interjecting itself into the situation and overriding the successful program we have in our state.

When Republicans eventually take power again in Washington, we should make it our mission to reduce the power of the federal government. States should not have to endure this sort of madness from the EPA.

The crux of this issue:

1. Texas is improving its environment, while continuing to grow economically and add jobs.

The Texas model stresses working with businesses to achieve results, which is far from the EPA's top-down, antagonistic way.

2. The federal government doesn't care about results. They care about process. They care about everyone following their one-size-fits-all way. Red tape. Bureaucracy. That Bill Lumbergh-ish sort of thing.

The people in charge in Washington aren't concerned about improving the environment. They're more concerned with expanding their own power and punishing those who deign to achieve success in their own ways.

3. The likely consequence of this federal takeover: numerous thousands of lost jobs, and Texas' success in reducing emissions may be compromised.

-------------------------------------

Previous Trivia Tidbit: Odds For Republican Wave Election In 2010.

Posted by Will Franklin · 28 May 2010 08:38 AM

Comments

Could these facts have any bearing on the decision of the administration to take over Texas' permitting?
1. The first refinery to by hit by the change is the Flint Hills refinery in Corpus Christi. Flint Hills is owned by Koch. The Koch family are big contributors to the Republican party.
2. Forcing Gov. Perry into court to try to reverse this change will make it easier to tar him as pro-pollution if he runs against Mr. Obama in 2012.
This looks like a win-win for the administration, even if it is eventually reversed.

Posted by: Dave at May 29, 2010 08:57 PM