WILLisms.com on Twitter
The Babe Theory Of Political Movements.
Mar. 21, 2005 11:50 AM
Iran's Sham Election In Houston.
June 20, 2005 5:36 AM
Yes, Kanye, Bush Does Care.
Oct. 31, 2005 12:41 AM
Health Care vs. Wealth Care.
Nov. 23, 2005 3:28 PM
Americans Voting With Their Feet.
Nov. 30, 2005 1:33 PM
Idea Majorities Do Matter.
May 12, 2006 6:15 PM
Twilight Zone Economics.
Oct. 17, 2006 12:30 AM
The "Shrinking" Middle Class.
Dec. 13, 2006 1:01 PM
From Ashes, GOP Opportunities.
Dec. 18, 2006 6:37 PM
Battle Between Entitlements & Pork.
Dec. 21, 2006 12:31 PM
Let Economic Freedom Reign.
Dec. 22, 2006 10:22 PM
Biggest Health Care Moment In Decades.
July 25, 2007 4:32 PM
Unions Antithetical to Liberty.
May 28, 2008 11:12 PM
Right To Work States Rock.
June 9, 2008 12:25 PM
Social Security Reform Thursday.
January 29, 2008
Caption Contest Archive
Jan. 21, 2009
The Carnival Of Classiness.
Mar. 14, 2006
Quotational Therapy: Obama.
Apr. 4, 2008
Mainstream Melee: Wolfowitz.
May 19, 2007
Pundit Roundtable: Leaks.
July 9, 2006
A WILLisms.com(ic), by Ken McCracken
July 14, 2006
Powered by Movable Type 3.17
Site Design by Sekimori
WILLisms.com January 2009 Book of the Month (certified classy):
The WILLisms.com Gift Shop:
This Week's Carnival of Revolutions:
Carnival Home Base:
Trivia Tidbit of the Day: Part 935 -- Workforce Participation (Or, The Lack Thereof) Masking Real Unemployment.
States Can Decide What Works For Themselves-
Jim Pethokoukis tweeted out a number about the American economy this morning that was particularly startling:
"11.4%: The unemployment rate if labor force was as big as it was when Obama took office in 2009"
Texanomics has looked at this phenomenon and noted that Texas' labor force has grown by leaps and bounds, while the U.S. labor force has shrunk (I sometimes modify their graphs a bit, so go check out the originals over there at Texanomics):
So, those droves of people moving to Texas: they're coming here looking for work. Not all are finding it right away, of course, which drives up the Texas unemployment rate, but Texas has created more new private sector jobs than all other 49 states over the past decade.
Last month, Texanomics also looked at what unemployment rates would be like in various states, including Texas, if labor forces had held steady at the "recovery" point of June 2009:
It's a little hard to read, shrunk-down like this, so go check out the original post. More explanation:
Texas' fast growing labor force is increasingly comprised of people fleeing other states to search for new opportunities in Texas. Indeed, the Texas labor force has continued to steadily grow even as more than 750,000 Americans have dropped out of the labor force since the beginning of 2009.
So, if labor forces had held steady since June of 2009, Texas' unemployment rate would be much lower and America's would be much higher.
While the Obamanomics has killed millions of jobs and generally put America in a deep, deep rut, with no sign of it getting better anytime soon, Texas has remained resilient. From May 2006 to May 2011, Texas added more jobs than all other states combined:
And Texas, under Governor Rick Perry's time in office, has also created more new private sector jobs, in net terms, than all other states combined:
It's no wonder, then, that people are asking whether Obama would stand a chance against Rick Perry, should he ultimately decide to run for President.
The real question, then, becomes how much worse would Obama's economy look without Texas? And how much better could Texas be doing without Obama?
For the number crunchers out there, I may or may not get around to this soon, but wouldn't it be interesting to figure the current Obama unemployment rate, minus Texas, based on workforce levels when Barack Obama came into office?
Yes, the national unemployment rate is officially 9.2%, but it is really so much worse:
The average unemployed worker has been without work for 39.7 weeks (nine months)—the longest since the government began keeping track in 1948.
We're fortunate people aren't wielding torches and pitchforks with these kinds of soul-numbing numbers. This is depressing data for America, and, based on my grocery and restaurant bills of late, inflation is here after, really, decades of being tamed. Indeed, the misery index is on the rise:
These misery index figures, in the twelves, are at levels not seen since Reagan took over from Jimmy Carter.
Obama will be a one-term President.
Previous Trivia Tidbit: Texas Winning Among Laboratories Of Democracy.
Posted by Will Franklin · 8 July 2011 11:30 AM
You should footnote that the formula for calculating cost-of-living has been revised 26 times since 1978. For comparison purposes, if we were still using the CPI calculation from the Carter era, which included energy and groceries, our current annualized inflation rate would be in excess of 12%, yielding a current Misery Index of over 21%. We're definitely in a 'Carter-World' now.
Posted by: David/California at July 8, 2011 02:47 PM
Thanks for that tidbit. I actually was just looking into the "real" inflation rate, but I am not enough of an expert to say with resolve that it's actually higher than the official inflation rate.
Posted by: Will Franklin at July 8, 2011 02:48 PM
Dave's right. The CPI books are so thoroughly cooked as to be useless. Remember that it assumes you buy a new house every month, amortized, of course, and the price of housing has been in a dive for the last 2 years. This drags down the rest of the index. Food and energy have been left off for some time so that you hear the newsman on the radio chirping that "excluding the volatile food and energy sectors, the CPI showed an increase of (some very small number, about .2-.5%)". Now multiply the small number by 12 to get the inflation rate, and be glad the "volatile" sectors of food, home heating, electricity, and gasoline were left out lest the number get too high.
Posted by: Billll at July 8, 2011 11:16 PM
Love the analysis here. Even the financial experts are starting to sound like a pet store full of talking birds and it's clear that the MSM doesn't want shine any sort of spotlight on the Texas economy because it provides a stark contrast and forces the issues into a different paradigm then the editorial spin they've been selling.
Posted by: James at July 10, 2011 08:06 AM
This piece of info is very useful for me, thank you!
Posted by: Sharon Watch at July 18, 2011 04:09 PM